Skip to footer

Ron Paul vs. the Federal Reserve: four epic moments

Ron Paul hasn't been the Federal Reserve's only critic, but he ranks among the most consistent and persistent in his charge that the Fed has debased the dollar and destroyed the wealth of Americans.

4. Paul to Greenspan: Confusing debt with assets

  • By Gail Russell Chaddock Staff writer
  • Mark Trumbull Staff writer

At a hearing of the Joint Economic Committee in 2004, Paul challenged Greenspan on the conventional wisdom that low interest rates and high consumer spending were good for the economy. By aggressively lowering interest rates, the Fed was "preventing the conventional liquidation and corrections that come in previous recessions," Paul said.

Early on, Paul also challenged the wisdom of using housing as an ATM for consumer spending. "I do not see how we can say we have true wealth without savings that's created artificially by the excitement of easy money and easy credit and artificially rising prices and then people go out and get into further debt."

"People when they become wealthier in paper terms ... do have collateral to borrow and to spend and they do," Greenspan said. "And that indeed has been an important factor in consumer expenditures over the last decade."

"My question is: Is it real collateral? That's the question," Paul said. "I'm afraid we're confusing debt with assets."

4 of 4
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.