Mitt Romney faces massive shortfall on personal popularity

An ABC/Washington Post poll shows only 35 percent of Americans view Mitt Romney favorably. But Gallup's first tracking poll of the campaign shows Romney and Obama in a tight race.

|
Steven Senne/AP
Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, and his wife, Ann, stand outside Fenway Park in Boston Monday.

On the likability front, Mitt Romney has his work cut out for him – to a historic degree.

Only 35 percent of Americans see the presumptive Republican nominee favorably, with 47 percent seeing him unfavorably, according to an ABC News/Washington Post poll released Monday. That makes Mr. Romney the first likely nominee to start the general election contest “underwater,” with more seeing him unfavorably than favorably, in the 28 years and eight presidential cycles the ABC/Post poll has been measuring candidates.

Romney trails President Obama in favorability – akin to personal popularity, not job approval – by 21 percentage points, 56 percent to 35 percent. Among women, Romney is seen favorably by just 27 percent, while 44 percent of men see him favorably.

But Romney can take heart.

“His [overall] favorable score is just a whisker from the previous low, Bill Clinton’s 37 percent in March 1992, in a race Clinton went on to win,” writes Gary Langer, pollster for ABC News. “But Clinton was damaged at the time by the Gennifer Flowers scandal and aided by soft ratings of the first President Bush, who was seen unfavorably by 47 percent, matching Romney’s negative rating among all adults today.”

And Mr. Clinton, of course, went on to become president. Mr. Langer also notes that Romney fares slightly better among registered voters, with 40 percent seeing him favorably and 47 percent unfavorably. He also suggests that Romney could benefit from the end of the competitive primaries.

“One bit of Romney’s baggage is the public’s negative assessment of the nominating process from which he’s emerging,” Langer writes. “Thirty-two percent of Americans rate ‘the Republican primaries’ as a whole favorably; 56 percent unfavorably.”

The ABC/Post poll didn’t report the head-to-head election matchup between Romney and Mr. Obama, but a Gallup tracking poll did – and the numbers work much better for Romney. The former Massachusetts governor leads Obama 47 percent to 45 percent among registered voters, which is within the margin of error.

Monday’s Gallup results were the inaugural “tracking” results of the 2012 campaign. Voters are polled daily, and Gallup reports results on the basis of continuous five-day rolling averages. So between now and Election Day, Nov. 6, there will be a new Gallup tracking average to report every day.

Gallup editor in chief Frank Newport notes that “candidates’ positioning in the spring of an election year is not necessarily good at forecasting election outcomes.”

In April 1992, the first President Bush was ahead with 41 percent of the vote, compared with 26 percent for Clinton and 25 percent for Ross Perot. In April 1980, Gallup had President Carter leading Ronald Reagan 42 percent to 24 percent, and John Anderson at 18 percent. Both presidents ended up losing.

“At this point,” writes Mr. Newport, “the results show that the 2012 presidential election is shaping up to be a close race.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Mitt Romney faces massive shortfall on personal popularity
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2012/0416/Mitt-Romney-faces-massive-shortfall-on-personal-popularity
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe