Obama: Rush Limbaugh slur disturbed me as a father

President Obama gave a wide-ranging press conference Tuesday, but his most heartfelt answer came in response to a question about the Rush Limbaugh controversy. He wouldn't want his daughters treated like that, he said. 

Jason Reed/REUTERS
President Obama addresses a news conference in the White House Briefing Room in Washington Tuesday.

In many ways, President Obama's first full scale press conference since November was classic Obama, confidently pivoting between foreign policy questions on Iran, Syria, and Afghanistan and logically laying out his case for administration policies. 

But twice in the crowded 45-minute session, his answers – about his two daughters, Malia and Sasha, and his wife, Michelle – provided a peek behind the president's professorial manner. For a president who presents himself as the Great Explainer, providing a picture of calm amid turbulent times, the moments provided a more visceral glimpse of the man in the Oval Office

After several questions on the Middle East Tuesday, Mr. Obama was asked whether he thought Rush Limbaugh was sincere when he apologized for calling Georgetown University Law student Sandra Fluke a “slut.” On his radio show, Mr. Limbaugh took exception to Ms. Fluke's telling members of Congress that health insurance should cover contraceptives. Obama later called Fluke as a show of support.

On Monday, Obama's response was personal. “The reason I called Ms. Fluke is because I thought about Malia and Sasha,” the president said. 

The president, who makes it a point of pride to be home for dinner with his daughters at 6:30 p.m. each night, said: “One of the things I want them to do as they get older is to engage in issues they care about, even ones I may not agree with them on. I want them to be able to speak their mind in a civil and thoughtful way."  

And, the president added, "I don’t want them attacked and called horrible names because they are being good citizens.”

The president would not comment on the sincerity of Limbaugh’s apology to Fluke. “I don’t know what is in Rush Limbaugh’s heart, so I am not going to comment on the sincerity of his apology,” Obama said, adding, “All decent folks can agree that the remarks that were made don’t have any place in public discourse.”

Immediately after the question on Limbaugh, the president was asked whether he thought Republicans were engaged in a war on women. In responding, the president referenced Michelle. “Women are going to make up their own mind in this election about who is advancing the issues that they care most deeply about. One of the things I have learned being married to Michelle is I don’t need to tell her what it is that she thinks is important,” the president said.

The president argued that strong women, like his wife, will consider a wide range of issues when deciding which party to support. “There are millions of strong women around the country who are going to make their own determination about a whole range of issues…. It is not going to be narrowly focused just on contraception. It is not going to be driven by one statement by one radio announcer…. I believe that Democrats have a better story to tell to women.”

The latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found the president has recently gained ground with women voters. Some 54 percent of women now approve of his performance, while 40 percent disapprove. In December, his standing with women was evenly split, with 47 percent approving and an equal number disapproving of his performance.

The president brushed aside a question about how he would respond to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney calling him the most feckless president since Jimmy Carter. Smiling broadly, with an eye on the Super Tuesday primaries, Obama said, “Good luck tonight. No, really, really.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.