Pentagon report stirs fresh debate on closing of prison at Guantánamo Bay

The first unclassified report on the suspected military backgrounds of Guantánamo Bay prisoners tells the stories of 107 detainees.

Charles Dharapak/AP/File
Dawn arrives at the now closed Camp X-Ray, which was used as the first detention facility for Al Qaeda and Taliban militants who were captured after the Sept. 11 attacks at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba.

The Pentagon has released the first unclassified report on the suspected military backgrounds of Guantánamo Bay prisoners. The report, which was obtained by Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R) of New Hampshire, has triggered renewed debate over closing the military prison.

In November, President Obama signed the 2016 defense policy bill, which requires the administration to provide more information about Guantánamo Bay’s 76 prisoners. The new report tells the stories of 107 detainees who were imprisoned as of the bill’s signing.

Karim Bostan, a former flower shop owner, was accused of running an Al Qaeda-affiliated explosives cell targeting coalition forces in eastern Afghanistan. Bostan has been detained at Guantánamo for over 13 years, but has been cleared for transfer to a country willing to accept him.

"While the Department of Defense watered down information and failed to provide key details regarding some detainees, the report still provides Americans with a consolidated, unclassified source of information regarding the dangerous terrorists at Guantánamo who the administration has recently released or plans to release soon," Senator Ayotte said in an email to the Associated Press.

Ayotte has been a vocal critic of the Obama administration, calling for more transparency about prison releases. She believes that Guantánamo detainees present a high risk for re-engagement in terrorism.

But the report also describes low-level militants, many detained for over a decade without charge.

Muhammad Said Salim Bin Salman is a Yemeni national who traveled to Afghanistan for Al Qaeda training. But he claims he never fought, and instead became a cook. He was detained for 14 years, until intelligence agencies assessed him as a medium risk and he was transferred to Oman.

David Remes, a human rights lawyer who represents several detainees, has called for the release of non-dangerous prisoners at Guantánamo Bay. He and other critics of the military prison argue that indefinite detention is incompatible with US values.

"Holding the men at all was a deep injustice and a lasting stain on the U.S. These men shouldn't have been in Guantánamo in the first place," Remes said. "It's one thing to prosecute detainees for attacks on the U.S.... It is quite another thing – and contrary to the values the US says it is committed to – to hold men for many years, who are accused of no crime."

According to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, 5 percent of Guantánamo prisoners released during Mr. Obama’s presidency have re-engaged in militant activities. During the Bush administration, the agency confirmed 21 percent had re-engaged.

During his presidential campaign, Obama had promised to close Guantánamo Bay before leaving office. In 2006, the military prison held about 240 prisoners. Since then, 162 have been released to other countries. 34 of the remaining prisoners have been cleared for transfer, says Myles Caggins, a spokesman for the National Security Council at the White House.

Republican lawmakers have accused Obama of downgrading detainees’ threat status in a rush to close the prison. Congress, which is composed of a GOP majority, has made efforts to slow detainee transfers.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Pentagon report stirs fresh debate on closing of prison at Guantánamo Bay
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today