Why Pentagon isn't scared by latest Islamic State threat

The Pentagon is confident that the Islamic State didn't hack its networks to get the names of 100 American service members. Troops just need to be smart, an official says.

Hasan Jamali
In this Thursday, March 19, 2015 file photo, U.S. sailors and pilots walk on the flight deck, checking for any debris, aboard the USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf. U.S. aircraft aboard the Carl Vinson as well as French military jets aboard the nearby French carrier Charles de Gaulle are flying missions over Iraq in the fight against Islamic State militants.

The Islamic State’s latest threat to 100 American troops has so far elicited no great concern from the Pentagon, which is encouraging its service members to be smart but not scared.

The Islamic State claims that its “Hacking Division” obtained names, photos, and addresses for 100 Marines, sailors, and military pilots through incursions into Department of Defense networks, and it has called on sympathizers to kill these troops “in their own lands.”

But the Pentagon dismisses the bold claims, and the threat “doesn’t change our level of concern,” says one United States military official, who could speak to the press only on condition of anonymity.

Officials are convinced that the names came from “open source” postings, like newspaper articles and social media sites. And the Pentagon doesn't want its troops to stop talking to the press or to shut down their social media accounts.

“We want troops to tell their stories,” the military official said. “We’re not going to stop telling stories about what we’re doing in the military.”

Service members simply need to use common sense when on social media sites. “These sites are tools that many of our service members and their families use,” to stay in touch during deployments, the official adds. 

“We want to help people who want to be on social media to share information in a manner that’s going to be a good experience for them, and to feel as safe as they can be.”

The Pentagon has long encouraged service members to take care with their Facebook and Twitter accounts. To this end, it has published tip sheets with basic suggestions including “don’t accept friend requests from people you don’t know.”

“Becoming friends with scammers allows them access to span your Timeline, tag you in posts and send you malicious messages. Your real friends may also end up being targeted,” reads a Pentagon “Guide to Keeping Your Social Media Accounts Secure.”

It also reminds troops to “never give out your login info,” even if people “promise to give you something (ex: free poker chips) if you share.”

The Pentagon and the broader American security apparatus are concerned about “lone wolf” terrorists. A recent study by the Southern Poverty Law Center found that three-quarters of the 60 terrorist incidents it studied involved a single person without accomplices.

But military officials say they are confident that the Islamic State did not hack into any Department of Defense (DoD) networks.

“We don’t believe that there has been any intrusion into any DoD networks,” says the military official. “We’re looking into it, but it looks like a compilation of open source information on social media.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.