How big a security threat are Latin America's problems? US general weighs in.

Gen. John Kelly, at a Senate hearing Thursday, called for a focus on stamping out the root causes of human and narco-trafficking in Latin America, so terrorists can't access smuggling routes.

Eduardo Verdugo/AP
Migrants walk along the rail tracks after getting off a train during their journey toward the US-Mexico border in Ixtepec, Mexico, July 12, 2014. The surge in unaccompanied minors and women with children migrating from Central America has put new attention on decades-old smuggling organizations.

In striking remarks this week, the US general in charge of the Pentagon’s Southern Command – which keeps an eye on security threats emanating from Latin America and the Caribbean – issued some rather dire warnings.

Terrorists would like nothing more than to make use of networks established by human and narco-traffickers to attack the US, perhaps bringing dirty bombs, Gen. John Kelly told lawmakers Thursday.

“Terrorist organizations could seek to leverage those same smuggling routes to move operatives with intent to cause grave harm to our citizens – or even bring weapons of mass destruction to the United States,” he said in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

There were roughly half a million migrants from Central America, including more than 50,000 unaccompanied children, apprehended last year on the border, by General Kelly’s estimates. Although a surge in Central Americans crossing illegally into the US has subsided since last summer, there are concerns that the impending warmer weather could bring another rise in illegal immigration.

Kelly also acknowledges – for better or worse – that it’s hard to judge whether the security threats might actually become realities, since the US military’s “limited intelligence capabilities make it difficult to fully assess the amount of terrorist financing generated in Latin America, or [to] understand the scope of possible criminal-terrorist collaboration.”

And so the safe bet is to focus on the poverty and demand that drive these human and narco-networks, which are “exacerbated by US drug consumption,” he said.

Indeed, the challenges posed by transnational crime syndicates are great, Kelly indicated.

“Powerful and well-resourced, these groups traffic in drugs – including cocaine, heroin, marijuana, counterfeit pharmaceuticals, and methamphetamine – small arms and explosives, precursor chemicals, illegally mined gold, counterfeit goods, people, and other contraband,” he warned. “They engage in money laundering, bribery, intimidation, and assassinations.”

These activities, in turn, have “wrought devastating consequences in many of our partner nations, degrading their civilian police and justice systems, corrupting their institutions, and contributing to a breakdown in citizen safety.”

Yet these problems tend to be eclipsed by other concerns in the US, Kelly acknowledged. “Frankly,” he said, “I believe we are overlooking a significant security threat.”

The Islamic State last year posted discussions on social media calling for the infiltration of the US southern border, Kelly noted.

What’s more, “in addition to thousands of Central Americans fleeing poverty and violence, foreign nationals from countries like Somalia, Bangladesh, Lebanon, and Pakistan” would like to use human smuggling networks to enter the US.

There is some good news, however, he told lawmakers: “Thankfully,” he said, “we have not yet seen evidence of this occurring.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.