Pentagon vs. Al Qaeda: Panetta hints at shifting US tactics

In a little-noticed policy speech, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta says Al Qaeda has been adapting to the US offensive against its leadership, requiring the Pentagon to adopt new tactics.

Rhona Wise/Reuters
US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta speaks during a change of command ceremony at the United States Southern Command in Doral, Florida, November 19.

In a little-noticed policy speech this week, America’s top defense official signaled a new direction for the Pentagon’s efforts in battling terrorism.

New tactics will include using more special operations forces and drones to conduct small strikes, as well as more partnership with foreign commandos. 

These are necessary in part because Al Qaeda has been quietly adapting to the growing US offensive against its leadership, senior US military officials warn.

“We have slowed the primary cancer,” Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told an audience Tuesday at the Center for a New American Security in Washington, referring to Al Qaeda. “But we know that the cancer has metastasized to other parts of the global body.” 

The result is that “the Al Qaeda cancer has also adapted to this pressure by becoming even more widely distributed, loosely knit, and geographically dispersed,” Mr. Panetta added. 

“After being left on the sidelines of the momentous change that swept through the Arab world last year, they are now seeking to take advantage of the transition period to gain new sanctuary, to incite violence, and to sow instability.” 

This poses a challenge for top Pentagon officials, Panetta acknowledged. One of these will be figuring out how to help small nations fight terrorists on their own soil.

Panetta pointed to Libya, where “violent extremists and affiliates of Al Qaeda attacked and killed innocent Americans.” 

In doing so, he waded into the controversy surrounding the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi. United Nations ambassador Susan Rice has come under sharp criticism from Republican lawmakers for saying in September that the administration had “decimated” Al Qaeda, saying that if that were the case, the consulate would not have been overrun.

Panetta for his part stressed in more specific terms that “Al Qaeda’s leadership ranks have been decimated.” 

This, he said, includes the killing of Al Qaeda’s five top leaders in the past two and a half years. 

Beyond the Benghazi controversy, Panetta said that the Pentagon will be particularly focused on completing the training of Afghan security forces in the nation where America has been at war for over a decade. 

US combat forces are scheduled to depart the country in 2014, but first they must “finish the job right,” he added.

This in turn will deter extremist forces from trying to once again find a foothold in Afghanistan and to send “a very simple and very powerful message to Al Qaeda, to the Taliban, to the violent extremist groups,” Panetta argued.

“We are not going anywhere,” he said. “Our commitment to Afghanistan is long term, and you cannot wait us out.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Pentagon vs. Al Qaeda: Panetta hints at shifting US tactics
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today