'Swift-Boating' Obama? Pentagon denounces politics of attack ad.

A group of former Special Operations Forces officers has criticized the White House for what it says were dangerous leaks of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden. Now, the US military is pushing back.

Courtesy of Pete Souza/White House/Reuters/File
President Obama (2nd l.) and Vice President Joe Biden (l.), along with members of the national security team, receive an update on the mission against Osama bin Laden in the Situation Room of the White House, in this May 2011 file photo.

The US military is pushing back against the campaign of a group of former Special Operations Forces officers who have spoken out against President Obama in what some have described as a latter-day “Swift Boat” campaign. 

The group in question is the Special Operations OPSEC Education Fund Inc. (OPSEC is short for operational security). It has criticized the White House for what it says were dangerous leaks of the raid that killed terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden

“As a citizen, it is my civic duty to tell the president to stop leaking information to the enemy,” says Benjamin Smith, a Navy SEAL, in an Internet film the group has produced. “It will get Americans killed.” 

Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, responded to the film, warning that using the uniform for partisan politics erodes the trust that people have in their military. 

“One of the things that marks us as a profession in a democracy is, it’s most important we remain apolitical,” he said Wednesday. “That’s how we maintain our trust with the American people. The American people don’t want us to become another special-interest group. In fact, I think that confuses them.” 

The OPSEC organizers in turn spoke out against Dempsey’s remarks. “We respect the Chairman’s views but as we are no longer on active duty we also appreciate our right to speak freely on issues we feel passionate about, including protecting those still in uniform from intelligence leaks and being used for partisan political purposes,” said Scott Taylor, president of OPSEC, in a statement. 

“Our nation has a very long history of former military figures continuing to serve the country through political activism, including 115 members of the current Congress and countless others,” he added.

Dempsey rejected the actions of such groups as OPSEC, regardless of whether its members are retired or on active duty. “If someone uses the uniform for partisan politics, I’m disappointed in that,” he said.

Some Special Operations Forces officers have had similar responses. For special operators to take part in political campaigns is “in violation of everything we’ve been taught, and the opposite of what we should be doing, which is being quiet professionals,” Army Special Forces Maj. Fernando Luján told the Associated Press

Unlike the largely passive response of John Kerry to so-called Swift Boaters in the 2004 presidential campaign, Mr. Obama has spoken out against the OPSEC group. “I don’t take these folks too seriously,” he told The Virginian-Pilot newspaper. “One of their members is a birther who denies I was born here, despite evidence to the contrary.” 

He is referring to retired Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, who has questioned the president’s birth in Hawaii and appears in the group’s Internet film.

The group criticizes the president in particular for what it says was a politically motivated push to take credit for the bin Laden raid. 

Adm. William McRaven, head of Special Operations Command, which planned the raid, took on such criticisms in an interview last month with CNN, noting the great risks involved in the operation. 

“At the end of the day – make no mistake about it – it was the president of the United States that shouldered the burden for this operation, that made the hard decisions, that was instrumental in the planning process,” he said, “because I pitched every plan to him.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Swift-Boating' Obama? Pentagon denounces politics of attack ad.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2012/0823/Swift-Boating-Obama-Pentagon-denounces-politics-of-attack-ad
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe