Prostitution scandal spreads: Marines pushed woman out of moving car

As Congress looks into allegations that military personnel and Secret Service members paid for prostitutes in Colombia, other charges involving three Marines in Brazil are coming to light.

Felipe Dana/AP
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta speaks at Brazil's Superior War College in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Wednesday. He has faced questions about a US military prostitution scandal in Brazil.

The scandal involving the use of prostitutes by Secret Service and US military personnel widened this week with the news that three Marines were caught last year in Brazil in a similar – though more hushed – scandal.

The three Marines in the Brazil incident were demoted one rank each, though under the rules of military justice they could also have faced one year of confinement. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta told reporters traveling with him in South America that the liaisons in Colombia this month are being thoroughly investigated and, if the facts bear it out, could result in charges.

Both sets of allegations are an embarrassment to the military and highlight why paying for sex is forbidden under the Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), even in countries – such as Colombia and Brazil – where prostitution is legal. 

A dozen US service members are currently under investigation by US Southern Command for the Colombia prostitution scandal. The office of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff also dispatched Vice Adm. William Gortney – who most recently grappled with Somali pirates as commander of the US Navy’s Fifth fleet – to meet with Senate and House Armed Services Committee members in closed-door briefings. 

In the incident brought to light during Secretary Panetta’s travels in Brazil, a prostitute was pushed out of a car after getting into an altercation with Marines regarding her payment due. 

The American embassy stepped in to reimburse her for medical expenses she incurred when she tried to crawl back into the moving vehicle. 

The UMCJ makes it clear that paying for sex is conduct unbecoming an officer. For soldiers, patronizing prostitutes is also considered conduct "prejudicial to good order and discipline.”

Some military officials say that many soldiers are not aware that prostitution is illegal under military law in countries where prostitution itself is permitted. “They should think about publicizing that more widely,” said one officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the press.

When the plans to add prostitution charges for the UCMJ were initially floated in 2004, many US troops reacted bitterly, calling such sanctions “harsh” in an interview the same year with the military publication, Stars and Stripes. “Next they’re going to tell us we can’t drink or only on the weekends,” one sergeant stationed in Germany, where prostitution is legal, told the newspaper. 

As much as the scandals are a blemish on the military, the greater concern is that the scandal has detracted from US policy, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey told reporters.

“We are embarrassed,” he said, referring to the Colombia reports. “Though we’re not exactly sure what it is, but what we do know is that we distracted ... [from] what was a very important regional engagement for our president,” he added. “We let the boss down.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.