In surprise move, Mike Enzi will chair Senate Budget Committee

Sen. Jeff Sessions, of Alabama, the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee for the past four years ended his effort Wednesday to becomes the panel's chairman. Sen. Mike Enzi, of Wyoming, will head the committee.

The Alabama lawmaker who has been the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee for the past four years ended his effort Wednesday to become the panel's chairman, clearing the way for a colleague from Wyoming to lead the committee when the GOP controls Congress next year.

The move means that Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., will chair the committee instead of Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., according to emailed statements from both lawmakers.

Though men both arrived in the Senate 18 years ago, Enzi has seniority on the Budget Committee — usually the key factor in determining committee chairmanships. Until now, he was best known for his work on the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.

In a surprise, Enzi said after last month's elections — in which Republicans captured Senate control — that he would pursue the Budget panel chairmanship.

Sessions and Enzi are both conservatives and had been expected to compete for the job.

In their statements, both senators lauded each other and said they'd made the decision after talking it over. They said Sessions would lead efforts to overhaul welfare.

The Budget Committee is expected to be at the center of GOP efforts next year to confront President Barack Obama over deficit cutting and other GOP policies.

Republican senators choose committee chairs by a vote of each panel's GOP members, which is then almost always rubber-stamped by the entire Senate GOP membership.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.