Arguments wrap up in Naval Academy assault case

Both the defense and prosecution rested on Wednesday in the trial of Midshipman Joshua Tate, a former US Naval Academy football player accused of sexually assaulting a female midshipman at a party.  

US Naval Academy/AP/File
Midshipman Joshua Tate, a former US Naval Academy football player accused of sexual assault.

The defense and prosecution rested on Wednesday in the court-martial of a former US Naval Academy football player accused of sexually assaulting a female midshipman when she was drunk.

Final arguments are set for Thursday in the trial of Midshipman Joshua Tate, a senior from Nashville,Tennessee.

Judge Marine Colonel Daniel Daugherty could make a judgment later on Thursday in the trial, one of a spate of sexual misconduct cases roiling the U.S. military.

The trial, which began on Tuesday, has largely centered on whether the accuser, now a 22-year-old senior, was too drunk at the off-campus party in April 2012 to consent to having sex.

Three U.S. Naval Academy football players were initially accused but Tate was the only one to be court-martialed. Charges against the other two were dropped.

One of the other men, Midshipman Eric Graham, of Eight MileAlabama, testified that the woman made sexual advances to him on the night of the alleged assault.

"She looked at me and told me she wanted to have sex with me," said Graham, who testified under a grant of immunity from prosecution. Charges against him were dismissed largely because Navy investigators failed to read him his rights.

Graham, who is withdrawing from the Naval Academy, said that although he could smell alcohol on the woman's breath, she seemed to be in control of herself and making her own decisions.

STATEMENT IN COURT

The third man, Tra'ves Bush, now a Navy ensign, echoed Graham's testimony. He said in a statement presented in court that the woman "looked like she had been drinking but she was in control of herself."

The woman testified that she had been torn about cooperating with Navy investigators about the sexual assault allegations and had concealed from them how much alcohol she had drunk.

She has contended she did not remember having sex with the midshipmen because of her drunkenness and only learned about the encounter the next day through social media and classmates.

Reuters does not report the names of sexual assault victims. Tate is accused of aggravated sexual assault and making false official statements

Daugherty denied a request by Tate's attorneys to find their client not guilty because of what they said was a failure by prosecutors to present enough evidence for a conviction.

The Defense Department said in December that there were slightly more than 5,000 reports of sexual assaults across the armed forces in the fiscal year through October, up about 50 percent from the previous year.

Academy Superintendent Vice Admiral Michael Miller denied in a January hearing that he was under pressure to go ahead with prosecution even though his legal counsel and a military judge had advised him not to proceed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.