Political misstep turns Chris Christie's long-time mentor against him

After winning a landslide reelection as Governor of New Jersey, Chris Christie failed in an attempt to remove the state Senate Republican leader, Tom Kean, son of Christies's long-time political mentor, former Governor Tom Kean Sr. 

Mel Evans/AP
N.J. Governor Chris Christie, (r.), smiles as he listens to former Governor Tom Kean Sr. during a campaign stop in Bridgewater, N.J. in 2008. When Christie tried to dump Tom Kean Jr. as state Senate Republican leader, he suffered a rare defeat, and alienated his political mentor Kean Sr.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie seldom makes a political miscalculation, as even his adversaries acknowledged after the incumbent Republican rolled to 60 percent of the vote to win re-election in a heavily Democratic state.

But when the likely 2016 presidential candidate maneuvered to dump Tom Kean Jr. as state Senate Republican leader two days later, he suffered a rare defeat — and alienated the lawmaker's father, Tom Kean Sr., a GOP elder statesman and popular former governor who gave Christie his political start.

"I'm as surprised as I've ever been in my life in politics," Kean, 78, told The Associated Press.

Christie has abruptly severed ties before — he fired his first education commissioner over mistakes on a federal grant application, for example. But, a week after Kean Jr. rallied enough Senate Republicans to easily rebuff the governor, Kean Sr. still seemed stung.

"I'm very disappointed," he said, noting that Christie hadn't phoned him or Kean Jr., and that he'd grown weary waiting for the call.

As Kean and Christie both tell it, Christie was a 14-year-old living in Livingston when his mother drove him to Kean's house and he knocked on the door.

"'Sir, I want to get involved in politics and I don't know how to do it,' " Kean said, recounting Christie's words in a 2010 interview. "I said, basically, 'I'm thinking of running for governor. If you want to find out, get in the car. I'm going up to Bergen County. Come with me and see if you like it."

Christie often refers to Kean as a mentor, and Kean has stayed involved in Christie's ascending career. He advised Christie in his first political race, put in a good word for him when George W. Bush was looking for U.S. Attorney in New Jersey, raised money for Christie's gubernatorial campaigns and spoke at his Nov. 5 re-election celebration.

Two days later, Kean said Christie made his move without having mentioned his intent to do so.

The question of Christie's loyalty has been raised before.

His Republican National Convention speech was panned as self-serving as the GOP was rallying behind Mitt Romney. His allegiance to Romney was doubted again when he embraced President Obama days before the 2012 presidential election. The hug, which came while Obama toured the Hurricane Sandy-battered Jersey shore, drew such fury that Christie was forced to do damage-control with calls to News Corp. chief Rupert Murdoch and other influential Republicans.

Romney lost, giving a Republican like Christie an open shot at the party's nomination for president in 2016.

Christie's office wouldn't comment on the flap, but most believe that the governor was trying to accommodate Stephen Sweeney, the Democratic Senate president who has partnered with Christie on key legislative initiatives.

Sweeney wasn't shy about his desire to have Kean Jr. dethroned after the Republican helped fund Sweeney's unsuccessful re-election opponent. Sweeney and others also blamed Kean for the GOP's failure to make gains in the Senate despite Christie's dominant win at the top of the ticket.

Some Republican lawmakers who ordinarily march in lockstep with the governor found Sweeney's attempt to dictate who the Republican leader would be so unappetizing they supported Kean.

"It was a mistake," former Gov. Dick Codey, a Democrat who was acting governor for 14 months in 2004-05, said of Christie's involvement. "I didn't understand it. It didn't put him in a good light."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.