Military judge refuses to delay trial of suspected Fort Hood shooter any longer

Maj. Nidal Hasan, who is accused of the deadly November 2009 shooting rampage at Fort Hood Army base, is expected to be court-martialed next week. 

AP Photo/Bell County Sheriffs Department/File
US Maj. Nidal Hasan at the San Antonio to Bell County Jail in Belton, Texas in 2010. Judge, Col. Gregory Gross decided at a pretrial hearing Tuesday not to delay the trial of Hasan.

A US military judge on Tuesday refused to again delay the trial of an Army psychiatrist charged in a deadly shooting rampage at an Army base in Texas, setting up a highly anticipated court-martial next week.

Maj. Nidal Hasan is charged with 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder in the November 2009 attack at Fort Hood. Hasan faces the death penalty or life in prison without parole if convicted.

The judge, Col. Gregory Gross, previously delayed the trial from March to June and then to August. In the latest request, defense attorneys argued they had not been able to look through 26 boxes of documents and talk to 20 new witnesses.

Gross again held Hasan in contempt of court and fined him $1,000 for refusing to shave his beard.

Beards are an Army violation. Hasan's attorneys have said he won't shave because it's an expression of his Muslim faith. But Gross said Hasan would be forcibly shaved before the trial if he doesn't shave the beard himself. He said he wants Hasan in the courtroom to prevent a possible appeal on the issue.

Hasan watched the rest of Tuesday's hearing in another room on closed-circuit television.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.