Osama bin Laden raid documents available online today

Documents recovered from Osama bin Laden's Pakistan compound will show bin Laden's strategy for overthrowing Afghanistan.

(AP Photo/Arshad Butt)
Supporters of Pakistan's religious party Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (Nazriati group) hold a a poster of the late Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden during a rally in Quetta, Pakistan on Wednesday, May 2, 2012.

Osama bin Laden was devising a strategy for overthrowing Afghan President Hamid Karzai and controlling Afghanistan once the US left the country, said a former U.S. official familiar with the cache of notes and letters that were seized last year in the raid on the terrorist leader's compound.

Bin Laden had discussed his plans with the Taliban leadership council, known as the Quetta Shura, and the Haqqani network, which controls the North Waziristan tribal area in Pakistan, said the former official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity while discussing the intelligence.

The haul of documents, hard drives and flash drives show bin Laden seeking to shape the future of Afghanistan but also struggling to manage an organization fractured by CIA drone assassinations and hampered by inexperienced leaders, officials say.

RELATED: Three reasons Al Qaeda is still dangerous

A declassified selection of the vast trove of material will be published online Thursday morning by the Combating Terrorism Center, a think tank at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point.

The Taliban and Al Qaeda don't agree on everything but still have a "relatively strong" relationship, said Seth Jones, an expert on al-Qaida at the Santa Monica, Calif.-based Rand Corp. think tank and author of "Hunting in the Shadows: The Pursuit of al Qa'ida Since 9/11."

"They are attempting to overthrow the Karzai regime, and they are both willing to work with each other to do that," he said.

The release of the declassified material follows President Barack Obama's surprise visit to Afghanistan on Tuesday that administration officials acknowledged was timed to coincide with the anniversary of the death of bin Laden.

Republicans have criticized the Obama campaign for using the killing of bin Laden by U.S. forces in Pakistan on May 2, 2011, as a political talking point.

The documents captured at that time also show that a key go-between for U.S. negotiations with the Taliban in Afghanistan had also been in touch with bin Laden.

Mohammed Tayeb Agha, an aide to Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar, met with U.S. officials at least three times in spring 2011. He was also in communication with bin Laden, who was looking for assurances about what kind of haven Al Qaeda's senior leaders would have in Afghanistan after a U.S. military withdrawal.

Some experts say the apparent double dealing underscores the uncertainty surrounding talks with the Taliban.

"I don't think a deal with them will mean a lot if the political situation shifts, and I think it inevitably will," said Brian Fishman, an Al Qaedaexpert at the New America Foundation in Washington.

But a U.S. official, noting that Tayeb Agha was in contact with a variety of groups, said, "It isn't a surprise to anyone that he has a less-than-clean Rolodex." The official asked not to be identified while discussing sensitive national security issues.

Bin Laden lamented the poor judgment shown by the rising crop of al-Qaida leaders. He was increasingly concerned that al-Qaida's credibility among Muslims had plummeted because commanders had bombed mosques and launched attacks that spilled the blood of fellow Muslims.

The missives show he was trying to steer the organization from regional conflicts and toward attacking the U.S. and other Western countries, known as the "far enemy." He wrote that "a large portion" of Muslims have "lost their trust" in al-Qaida, said U.S. officials who have read the documents.

Al-Qaida's leadership even discussed changing the organization's name to revive its reputation, John Brennan, the top counterterrorism adviser to Obama, said in a speech Monday.

Brennan said the bin Laden letters prove that the CIA's controversial campaign of drone missile strikes has decimated al-Qaida's leadership, hurt morale and made it harder for al-Qaida to recruit new members.

"In short, al-Qaida is losing, badly," Brennan said. "And bin Laden knew it. In documents we seized, he confessed to 'disaster after disaster.' He even urged his leaders to flee the tribal regions and go to places 'away from aircraft photography and bombardment.'"

Brennan said that al-Qaida's leaders continue to struggle to communicate with subordinates and affiliates, and that it is "harder than ever" for the leadership to plan attacks against the U.S.

Figures from the National Counterterrorism Center show that successful attacks by al-Qaida have dropped 16 percent in the year since bin Laden's death compared with the year before, according to an analysis released this week by the Center for American Progress in Washington.

Although the threat from al-Qaida's top leadership in Pakistan may be declining, the organization's branches in Somalia, Yemen and North Africa are operating with more independence, officials said.

___

(c)2012 Tribune Co.

Distributed by MCT Information Services

RELATED: Three reasons Al Qaeda is still dangerous

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.