‘She’s very well prepared’: Ketanji Brown Jackson’s collegial Senate visits

As she meets with senators before her confirmation hearings, Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson restores a collegial tone to a process that had grown embittered.

AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File
Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson meets with Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Sen. Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, on Capitol Hill, March 2, 2022, in Washington.

Engaging in lawyerly small talk, Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley was telling Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson this past week how he met his wife while clerking at the high court.

Judge Jackson already knew the story, he discovered. She even “filled in some of the details for me.”

“So I thought — she’s very well prepared.”

Judge Jackson was prepared, as well, for the Republican senator’s questions about Guantanamo Bay detainees she represented 15 years ago as a public defender and, after that, in private practice. Senator Hawley said after the meeting that he is still concerned about that part of her record but found her forthcoming and engaging, with a “very high degree” of legal acumen.

“I think her hearings will be very substantive,” he said.

Judge Jackson, who sits on the federal appeals court and would replace retiring Justice Stephen Breyer, is unlikely to need support from Senator Hawley or any other Republican to be confirmed, and may not win over any of them. But as she makes the rounds at the Capitol, traversing from one Senate office to the next before her confirmation hearings later this month, Judge Jackson is networking with zeal, restoring a collegial tone to a confirmation process that had grown increasingly embittered under former President Trump.

“I want to make this a bipartisan vote,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin said after Justice Breyer announced his retirement. “I think it is not only good for the Supreme Court, it’s good for the Senate.”

Democrats and the White House are hoping that Judge Jackson’s enviable résumé, empathetic style, and historic potential as the first Black female justice will win at least a few crossover votes. And because her confirmation to replace the liberal-leaning Justice Breyer wouldn’t shift the ideological balance of the court, Republicans aren’t expending much political energy opposing her.

Senator Durbin and President Joe Biden have been reaching out to some GOP senators personally, promising to answer any questions and give them extended time with the nominee.

The most gettable Republican vote is Maine Sen. Susan Collins, who has already received three calls from Mr. Biden and met Judge Jackson for more than 90 minutes on Tuesday. Senator Collins, one of only three Republicans to vote for Judge Jackson when she was confirmed to the circuit court last year, called the meeting “lengthy and very productive.” She signaled that the nominee is likely to have her vote.

“She takes a very thorough, careful approach in applying the law to the facts of the case, and that is what I want to see in a judge,” Senator Collins said.

Judge Jackson was prepared for the small talk in that meeting, as well, telling Senator Collins in the first few minutes that she got engaged to her husband in Maine.

“She passed that test,” Senator Collins joked to reporters in her office as the two women smiled together for the cameras.

Even if other Republicans don’t vote for Judge Jackson, it’s clear that she has impressed many of them as she has navigated the awkward ritual of the meet and greet. Texas Sen. John Cornyn praised her experience as a public defender and said she was “charming.” North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis noted how prepared she was, a move he said was “wise.” Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse shook her hand and congratulated her while the two smiled for cameras under a large buffalo head on his office wall.

The effusiveness from some Republicans is a sharp departure from the last several Supreme Court nominations.

In 2016, after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the Republican majority denied a vote on President Barack Obama’s nominee, now-Attorney General Merrick Garland, and most Republicans refused even to meet him. Democrats’ frustration over their jilted nominee was ever-present when Mr. Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to fill the post the next year.

In 2018, Mr. Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh to replace retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy; his confirmation came after an explosive, combative hearing in which Christine Blasey Ford accused him of sexually assaulting her in high school, which Mr. Kavanaugh denied.

And Democrats had few words of praise for Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who Mr. Trump nominated to replace the liberal icon Ruth Bader Ginsburg after her death just weeks before the 2020 presidential election.

Republican reaction to Judge Jackson hasn’t all been positive. Before Mr. Biden named her as the nominee, several Republicans, including Senator Hawley, criticized the president’s pledge to nominate a Black woman to the post. Senator Hawley called the pledge “hard woke left.” Texas Sen. Ted Cruz said it was “offensive” to have that criteria. Mississippi Sen. Roger Wicker likened it to affirmative action.

The good vibes could dissipate in the hearings, as well, if race moves to the forefront or if some Republicans make more personal arguments against her. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell has so far signaled to his ranks to avoid that kind of questioning and keep the focus on issues they see as more damaging to Democrats, like inflation.

Asked about Mr. Biden’s pledge to nominate a Black woman, Senator McConnell replied, “Honestly, I did not think that was inappropriate.”

Still, Republicans are sure to question Judge Jackson aggressively at her confirmation hearings, which begin March 21, and criticize her for any rulings that they see as too far to the left. Senators Hawley, Cornyn, and Tillis — all members of the Senate Judiciary Committee — said they have questions about whether Judge Jackson is guided by any specific judicial philosophy.

Democrats who have met with the nominee appear thrilled with Mr. Biden’s choice, gushing over Judge Jackson’s eight years as a federal judge, her time as a public defender, and her ability to connect with others — a quality they say could help her bring the Supreme Court closer together, as well.

Democratic Sen. Mazie Hirono, a member of the Judiciary panel, said that when she met with Judge Jackson she asked her what stood out to her most about Justice Breyer, whom she had clerked for many years ago. She said Judge Jackson replied that it was the justice’s ability to reach out to other members of the court.

“Even if she can’t convince other people to her way of approaching a case, I think that that willingness to talk, and understanding another perspective, is a very important aspect of the kind of person she is,” Senator Hirono said.

Another Democrat on the committee, Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal, said after his meeting with the nominee that Judge Jackson has a “really engaging personality” as well as a superior intellect.

“What really struck me most was her personal depth and warmth, and her intuitive interest in how real people are affected by her decisions beyond the abstract legalisms,” Senator Blumenthal said.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to ‘She’s very well prepared’: Ketanji Brown Jackson’s collegial Senate visits
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today