Should people named in restraining orders be allowed to own guns?

The Connecticut legislature passed a bill Monday that will keep those under temporary restraining orders from being allowed to hold or buy firearms.

Jim Young/Reuters
Handguns are seen for sale in a display case at Metro Shooting Supplies in Bridgeton, Mo. A new Connecticut law would block the purchase of guns to those under temporary restraining orders.

Connecticut’s legislature made a significant move to protect victims of domestic violence from further harm by abusers by passing a bill that will block people under a temporary restraining order from being in possession of a gun.

“With this legislation, we've taken an important step towards protecting victims of domestic violence,” Lt. Gov. Nancy Wyman said in an official statement. “Rather than endure the hand-wringing that follows a deadly family violence incident, Connecticut is addressing the threat that firearms make to victims – before a life is lost.”

After passing through the state’s House last week and Senate on Monday, the bill is headed to the desk of Gov. Dannel Malloy for signing. The Democratic governor introduced a version of the “commonsense” legislation to Connecticut’s General Assembly in February and has supported the effort since then.

“We have a moral obligation to work to prevent needless tragedy and to make this the law.  Women in abusive relationships are five times more likely to be killed if their abuser has access to a firearm,” Malloy said. “When an instance of domestic violence rises to the point that a temporary restraining order is needed, we must do everything we can to prevent tragedy. Now, Connecticut will take a commonsense step towards strengthening and enhancing our gun violence protection laws.”

While the state already blocks firearm possession in conjunction with permanent restraining orders, those under temporary restraint are subject to a hearing before their status and ability to have a deadly weapon can be changed. Those days and hours before a hearing also happen to be the period when the potential victims of those subject to restraining orders have been found to be most vulnerable to harm, especially if guns are involved. Connecticut averaged 14 intimate partner homicides annually from 2000 to 2012, said Malloy, and firearms were the most frequently utilized weapons in those cases.

The new law would require those served with a temporary order to turn over their firearms within one day of issuance. Guns could be returned within a week of their seizure if a hearing results in the dropping of a formal restraining order.

Connecticut joins more than a dozen other states that have moved to toughen guns restrictions for domestic abusers, as gun violence between partners remains relatively prevalent. Between 2006 and 2014, 760 people were killed annually by their spouses or partners in the United States, according to the Associated Press.

Many states have yet to enact similar laws, and federal regulations are generally considered to be less effective than more local oversight, but Connecticut’s lead may soon extend to the national level. US Sen. Richard Blumenthal plans to introduce similar legislation in Congress, ABC News reports, to “end its complicity with domestic violence gun deaths.”

“Abusers are often at the height of their rage after being served with a temporary restraining order, and this new Connecticut law removes deadly weapons from their hands before they can cause irreversible harm,” Sen. Blumenthal told ABC. “The link between guns and domestic violence is a deadly one. We must act quickly. Lives are literally on the line.”

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Should people named in restraining orders be allowed to own guns?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today