Ten years after Katrina, officers to plead guilty to Danziger Bridge shooting

Five former New Orleans police officers agreed to plea deals relating to the fatal shooting of two unarmed civilians fleeing the city after hurricane Katrina.

Gerald Herbert/AP
Former New Orleans police sergeant Arthur Kaufman (c.) arrives at Federal Court in New Orleans on Wednesday.

Five former New Orleans police officers charged in connection to the deadly Danziger Bridge shooting in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina on Wednesday pleaded guilty in federal court in exchange for reduced sentences.

The ex-officers had initially been convicted of the 2005 shootings in 2011, a decision that was revoked in 2013 by US District Judge Kurt Engelhardt due to prosecutor misconduct. Four of the five officers have been incarcerated for around six years due to their direct involvement in the shooting, while the fifth is out on bond. The agreement, announced Wednesday, will credit the officers for time served in their final sentences, which are expected to be drastically reduced as part of the plea deals.

The Times-Picayune reported that the four officers originally facing the most prison time, ranging from 38 to 65 years, will now each be sentenced to no more than 12 years. The former officer out on bond is expected to see his sentence reduced from six years to three.

The incident in question occurred in September 2005, six days after Katrina hit New Orleans, amid devastating flooding that trapped hundreds if not thousands of residents in the city with no access to food or shelter. Frustrated by overflowing emergency shelters, some residents attempted to flee the city across the Danziger Bridge.

After responding to an unconfirmed report of someone firing on an officer, former officers Robert Faulcon and Anthony Villavaso, along with ex-sergeants Kenneth Bowen and Robert Gisevius, gunned down James Brissette, then 17 years old, and Ronald Madison, who was mentally disabled, as they attempted to cross the bridge. Officer Faulcon shot Mr. Madison was shot in the back.

The officers also wounded four members of the family of Leonard Bartholomew IV. James was friends with Mr. Bartholomew's nephew, Jose Holmes, who was shot several times. Madison's brother Lance and Bartholomew's 14-year-old son Leonard, also at the scene, were unharmed.

The officers proceeded to cover up the shooting by planting a gun, falsifying reports, and inventing witnesses, according to prosecutors. Lance Madison was also arrested and charged with the attempted murder of police officers, but was later cleared.

Sgt. Arthur Kaufman, out on bail, was accused of planning the cover-up. Officer Gerard Dugue, also accused of participating in the cover-up, was tried separately from the five involved in Wednesday's plea deal; his 2012 trial ended in a mistrial and further proceedings have yet to be scheduled.

The shooting, and other controversies surrounding the New Orleans Police Department, spurred a Department of Justice investigation initiated by newly-elected Mayor Mitch Landrieu in 2010, which resulted in strict reforms within the department.

The officers' original sentencing came apart after a scandal involving the US Attorney's Office led Judge Engelhardt to throw out the original verdict following a Justice Department investigation. Some attorneys involved in the Danziger case were found to have posted anonymous comments on the Internet regarding the legal proceedings, a revelation which Engelhardt declared to be "grotesque prosecutorial misconduct."

Despite that decision, prosecutors at the time said that the misconduct was unproven to have affected the initial verdict.

The plea agreement will likely put an end to the Danziger Bridge saga after more than a decade, finally leaving the families of those affected with some closure – although the punishments set for Faulcon, Villavaso, Bowen, Gisevius, and Kaufman will be far less than those the convicted ex-cops originally faced.

Although Lance Madison said justice was served in the case, he also said in a statement that the prison time the officers will serve "will never be enough to make up for what they did."

This report includes material from The Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.