San Bernardino shooter posted jihadi Facebook message in 2012: How should FBI respond?

The FBI weighs new social media monitoring protocols amid the realization that one of the San Bernardino shooters sent Facebook messages promoting violent jihad in 2012.

Charles Rex Arbogast/AP/File
Zarine Khan (r.) and Shafi Khan, attend a news conference, Oct. 9, 2014. Ms. Khan, mother of a young man facing a terrorist charge for trying to join Islamic State militants says the group is 'brainwashing' youths via social media and declared, 'Leave our children alone!'

Investigators scouring the online accounts of two proven terrorists have uncovered Facebook messages in support of jihad dating as far back as 2012.

Investigators have found private messages promoting terrorist groups sent to friends and family in Pakistan from Tashfeen Malik, who along with her husband shot 14 people in San Bernardino, Calif., before ultimately dying in a gun battle with police. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is now coming to terms with how to investigate social media to stop terrorists before they act.

Law enforcement has been cautious about trawling social media during terrorist investigations because of privacy, but they began developing procedures to search individual social media accounts after the San Bernardino shooting, although they have not released specific details for fear of compromising the investigations.

The FBI uncovered evidence suggesting Ms. Malik and her husband, Syed Rizwan Farook, had been radicalized long before the shooting, but law enforcement had previously said that the couple managed to stay under counterterrorism investigators' radar by not espousing those views online. In the past, the FBI has been able to identify individuals plotting to join the Islamic State militant group in Syria by monitoring online chat rooms and public social media postings. The question of delving into private messages, however, has remained thornier.

Legislators considered harnessing the power of social media to fight terrorism even before the Dec. 2 shooting. In July, The Christian Science Monitor reported on a Senate bill to require social media companies to inform law enforcement when users promoted terrorism on private online accounts:

However, tech industry officials said the requirements in Senate legislation are too extensive and could impose harsh penalties if they miss a post. They also said that law enforcement officials may be flooded by tips in a way that would make it harder to home in on useful information.... Increasing efforts by the government to monitor social media sites for extremist activity come as terror groups take advantage of the Internet for their messaging and recruiting efforts.

Officials estimate a few thousand social media accounts can spawn 200,000 pro-Islamic State tweets in a single day, as The Monitor's Warren Richey has previously reported. They are concerned Islamic State terrorist leaders could broadcast a call to arms via social media and ignite violent attacks from their supporters worldwide.

This discovery of the pro-jihad Facebook messages years before Malik even received her visa to enter the United States show law enforcement missed hints of radicalization on social media, which is why the FBI is now creating paths to monitor potential radicals' online presence more closely.

This report contains information from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.