Chicago cop due in court on murder charge, reignites debate over police videos

Chicago officer Jason Van Dyke is set to appear in court Monday to learn whether or not he will be offered bond, in a case that has again highlighted debate around the role of video in police work.

Cook County Sheriff's Office/AP
Officer Jason Van Dyke, who was charged with first degree murder after a squad car video caught him fatally shooting 17-year-old Laquan McDonald 16 times, is shown in this photo released Nov. 24. Mr. Van Dyke is scheduled to return to court Monday to learn whether he'll be offered bond.

A white Chicago police officer facing a murder charge after a squad car video showed him fatally shooting a black teenager 16 times will make a second court appearance Monday to learn whether or not he will be granted bond.

A Cook County judge, who said he wanted to see the video before ruling on the issue of the bond, ordered 14-year Chicago Police Department veteran Jason Van Dyke to stay in custody after he was charged last Tuesday with first-degree murder in the death of Laquan McDonald in October 2014.

The issue has once more underscored the growing debate around the role of video in promoting transparency around police work: Even as some over the last year pushed for the video’s release, others – including the local police department, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, Laquan’s family, and some activists – have fought to keep it secret. Some experts say that the pushback comes partly out of concern for the victim’s family, as well as how the footage might be used.

“From a public opinion perspective, it’s interesting because people are very supportive of cameras in the interest of transparency, but they’re much less supportive of the general public having access to video,” said William Sousa, director of the Center for Crime and Justice Policy at the University of Nevada in Las Vegas, to the Monitor last week.

“It ties back to this idea that transparency is a very good thing, but we have to also balance the rights of the officers, the rights of citizens, and respect due process in terms of the way that we treat evidence – and it’s all a balance that cities are really struggling with now,” he said.

The footage, released Tuesday, shows Mr. Van Dyke jumping out of his squad car and shooting Laquan as the teenager, a small knife in hand, tries to walk past Van Dyke and some other officers. Demonstrations have since been held in protest of the killing, and reached their height on Black Friday when up to 2,000 people protesting police violence marched along the city’s “Magnificent Mile” district on the busiest shopping day of the year.

At the same time, Chicago’s main police union has stood behind Van Dyke, posting a bail fund appeal for the officer on its website. The Chicago lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police is also paying for Van Dyke’s defense, a common practice among police unions in the United States.

Some officers have expressed concern that the decision by Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez to charge Van Dyke with first-degree murder was politically motivated. Others said it shows little understanding of the pressures that officers face when dealing with a suspect holding a weapon.

"A police officer sees that video and has a different mindset than the rest of the people out there,” the officer, who asked not to be named, told Reuters. “It could be one of us.”

This report contains material from The Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Chicago cop due in court on murder charge, reignites debate over police videos
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today