Polish court slams US judicial system in refusal to extradite Roman Polansky

A Polish court has decided not to extradite Roman Polanski to the United States. Polanski is wanted by US authorities for a 1977 conviction of having sexual relations with a minor.

A Polish court has rejected attempts by the United States to extradite director Roman Polanski his 1977 conviction for unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, citing misconduct by the part of the US court system.

Judge Dariusz Mazur said on Friday that Mr. Polanski's extradition could not be allowed under Polish law. Polanski’s right to a fair trial and defense were “grossly and repeatedly violated,” Judge Mazur said, according to Reuters.

Mazur's decision is the latest in a case that has spanned four decades. Polanski pleaded guilty in 1977 to sex with a minor but fled to Europe before his sentencing. He holds French and Polish citizenship, and France’s limited extradition policies have protected him for years.

In 2009, Polanski was arrested during a visit to his vacation home in Switzerland. The Swiss police were acting on a request from the US government, and Polanski was held in house arrest until 2010 when the Swiss government ultimately decided not to extradite him.

Polanski served 42 days in jail after accepting a plea deal in 1977. He fled after learning that the court judge overseeing the trial had decided to change his sentencing.

Mazur said it was clear Polanksi was guilty but argued that various restrictions placed on the director’s freedoms equated to a year-long jail term, more than his original plea deal agreed to.

Judge Mazur also cited concerns over comments made by US judges in response to the trial. He referred to statements made last year by a Los Angeles judge, who said Polanski should “cool his heels in jail,” if the filmmaker returned to the US under a proposed deal that would have pronounced his time served.

“If I were to behave like them, I’d lose the respect of all my subordinates here,” Mazur said, according to The New York Times.

The case has prompted a range of opinions over the years. Some demand harsh sentencing and others urging the case be dropped.

Samantha Geimer, the victim in the case, is urging for the charges to be dropped.

"The message is they will use a teenage rape victim until their dying breath to get some PR, and justice is NOT something they seek for victims …” she wrote on her Facebook page.

This report includes material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Polish court slams US judicial system in refusal to extradite Roman Polansky
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today