D.C. cop ends up in epic dance-off with teen after breaking up fight

In trying to disperse a crowd following a fight in Washington, D.C., a District police officer challenged a 17-year-old girl to a dance-off, part of which is captured in a video that has gone viral. 

A Washington, D.C., police officer found herself in an unusual confrontation with a high school student earlier this week that tested skills not taught at the police academy.

In an effort to break up a lingering crowd following a fight, a female D.C. police officer ended up in a dance-off with a 17-year-old high school student, The Washington Post reports.

Though anecdotal and brief, this hip-shaking, moon-walking encounter in southwest Washington serves as a comical reminder that positive interactions do happen between the police and the communities they serve. Despite recent spotlights on police brutality and incidents of excessive force, such pleasant encounters might be more common than media portrays.

On Monday afternoon, Aaliyah Taylor, a senior at Ballou High School, allegedly approached the uniformed officer and began playing the hit pop song “Watch Me (Whip/Nae Nae)” by rapper Silentó.

She then started to dance the eponymous Nae Nae, but the officer, who wanted to remain anonymous, wasn’t impressed. Ms. Taylor says she laughed at her, but instead of brushing her off, the officer claimed her own moves were better and challenged her to a dance-off.

If the teens win, she told Taylor, they could remain in the area. But if she won, they’d have to leave.

What ensued was several minutes of silly but impressive simultaneous dancing, a portion of which Taylor’s friends captured on video.

“Instead of us fighting, she tried to turn it around and make it something fun,” Taylor tells the Post. “I never expected cops to be that cool. There are some good cops.”

The officer later explained to the Post that she doesn’t want to reveal her identity because the story isn’t about her. She had joined the department about three years ago and recently completed a tour in Iraq.

“It’s kind of embarrassing that this became so big,” she says. “This is what we do everyday.”

Though it might have been just another ordinary day for this dancing cop, some of her fellow officers across the country are thrilled that her moves made it on camera.

“A lot of people are surprised with this video, and I’m happy with it, and that’s all great, but the truth of the matter is that police officers all around the country have millions of contacts [with citizens] everyday,” says Jim Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, the largest union for officers in the United States.

“People are very quick to take out their cell phones when they see a confrontation,” he tells The Christian Science Monitor, “but almost never tape the good things.”

According to the latest information from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, among a surveyed pool of 60,000 people who had contact with the police, about nine out of 10 felt that in their most recent encounter, the police were respectful or acted properly.

In the same 2008 study, researchers found that only 1.4 percent of respondents said that officers used or threatened to use force against them. However, young, black, or male Americans were more likely to experience force than any other demographic group.

“The vast majority of police officers do their jobs everyday, anonymously and heroically,” Pasco says. This particular D.C. officer has an innate ability to develop rapport, he explains, but many other cops are capable of it as well.

For Taylor, Monday’s dance-off proved that such cops do exist. Growing up in a black family with six sisters and one brother, she says, all of whom have been arrested for nonviolent offenses, she’d only heard stories about excessively rude or rough officers.

“I thought all cops were cruel because that’s how I saw them,” she says. “I’ve now seen there are good cops out there.”

In the end, the crowds finally dispersed but there was no official victor in Monday’s impromptu dance competition, as the opponents both claimed herself to be the winner. 

So, the two valiant competitors hugged and went their ways.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.