Girls charged in Slender Man stabbing will face trial in October – as adults

Anissa Weier and Morgan Geyser, who were 12 years old at the time of the crime, have both been charged as adults with attempted first-degree homicide.

Mike De Sisti/Milwaukee Journal Sentinel/AP/File
Waukesha County Circuit Judge Michael Bohren speaks at a Waukesha County court in Waukesha, Wis., Aug. 10. The judge ruled that two girls accused of stabbing a classmate to please the online horror character Slender Man will stay in adult court, where they could face decades in prison.

Two girls from Wisconsin who are charged with attempting to kill a classmate to satisfy the fictional Internet character Slender Man will face trial on October 15, a judge ruled Friday.

Anissa Weier and Morgan Geyser, who were 12 years old at the time of the crime, have both been charged as adults with attempted first-degree homicide. The defense attorneys in the case are considering appealing the judge’s ruling that the case remain in adult court.

"We are very disappointed with that decision," said Donna Kuchler, one of Ms. Geyser's attorneys.

Under Wisconsin law, prosecutors are required to file adult charges in all homicide or attempted homicide cases in which the accused is over 10 years old. The cut off used to be 12 years old, but a 1991 shooting by an 11-year-old boy prompted lawmakers in Wisconsin to lower the age at which an offender must be tried as an adult in 1995.

Bonnie Ladwig, the former Republican representative who authored the new law, told CBS News last year that charging the girls as adults was "the right thing to do."

"Obviously these girls have been planning this since December so this wasn't just an accident," she said.

According to police, the girls stabbed their friend 19 times and left her in the woods for dead. A bicyclist found the victim and she has since recovered. The girls reportedly told law enforcement that they had planned to kill their friend in an effort to please the Slender Man in hopes of joining him in his home.

The case made national headlines not only for the bizarre circumstances, but also for the decision to try the two girls as adults, as The Christian Science Monitor reported at the time.

“Some juvenile justice experts say such a motive points to a confused mental state or stunted emotional development – reasons often cited for not trying minors as adults," the Monitor's Mark Guarino wrote. 

“If the girls are tried and convicted in adult court, the ramifications could be lifelong. Wisconsin law states that a person convicted as a juvenile must be released from the system at age 25. If the girls are convicted as adults, they could face up to 65 years in prison,” the Monitor reported in February.

Some experts have criticized giving juveniles long, mandatory sentences.

“These mandatory adult sentences are highly controversial for many reasons. Not all juvenile offenders will commit crimes years later, as adults. Efforts to predict which juveniles will and will not continue to offend, regardless of treatment and rehabilitation efforts, have been largely unsuccessful,” wrote Tina Freiburger, associate professor and chair of the criminal justice department at the University of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, in her blog for The Huffington Post.

Geyser’s attorneys now say that their client should be placed in the juvenile system where she would receive adequate treatment for mental illness.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.