Zimmerman verdict protests: Los Angeles police get 'A-plus'

The Los Angeles Police Department has had its share of troubles. But its handling of the George Zimmerman verdict protests shows that it has learned important lessons.

Mario Anzuoni/Reuters
Los Angeles Police Department officers stand outside police headquarters during a rally organized by the Act Now to Stop War and End Racism (ANSWER) coalition in Los Angeles Tuesday to protest the acquittal of George Zimmerman for the shooting death of Florida teenager Trayvon Martin.

The Los Angeles Police Department – which has repeatedly come in for its share of scrutiny during the past 20 years – is getting high marks for its handling of community protests in the wake of the George Zimmerman verdict.

“I would give them an A-plus,” says Najee Ali, a prominent black activist who has been a leader of the local protest movement since the Rodney King riots in 1992. LAPD officers “backed off and let us vent when we needed to, and then also got tough in cracking down when outside provocateurs tried to take advantage.”

That restraint came from having long talks ahead of time with activist groups such as the NAACP, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, and local groups, Mr. Ali and others say.

“They told us ahead of time to not go into the streets, block traffic, or vandalize stores,” says Ali. “So if any of those things began to happen, they knew it was from outside agitators and it was time to crack down,” he says. “Twenty years ago, under [former LAPD Chief] Daryl Gates, they would have come in with guns blazing and probably cracked some heads.”

It is a past that recent police chiefs have tried to put behind the city. Beyond the Rodney King riots and bloody scuffles outside the 2000 Democratic National Convention, the problem came to a head during a large pro-immigrant rally in May 2007 in MacArthur Park.

Members of the department's elite Metropolitan Division swept through the park indiscriminately swinging batons and firing rubber bullets to clear out the mostly peaceful protesters after a small group of agitators pelted officers with batteries and other objects. Dozens of people, including a number of journalists and police officers, were injured and the city ultimately paid $13 million to settle lawsuits that arose from the clash.

Then-Chief William Bratton launched an effort to teach the LAPD's roughly 10,000 officers a more even approach to tense showdowns with unruly protesters. The effort was part of a campaign by Mr. Bratton to rebuild the department's standing, especially in minority neighborhoods.

Current Chief Charlie Beck has continued Bratton's approach – and has increased communication with minority communities at key moments.

When the LAPD decided to change tactics Tuesday, deploying 350 officers after young people stormed a Wal-Mart, attacked a television crew, and taunted passing cars, Ali called off some protests.

“Both sides have learned a few things,” says Earl Ofari Hutchinson, who chairs the Los Angeles Urban Policy Roundtable and is the author of several books on the black experience in America.

Mr. Hutchinson says both activists and police have formally agreed to diffuse problems that might escalate by trying to channel public anger into political solutions. To that end, city leaders have agreed to pass a resolution next week calling for the US Justice Department to pursue federal charges against Mr. Zimmerman on civil rights violations.

“We’ve crafted language we think could be duplicated in other large, American cities and we feel this is what gets politicians’ attention and lets the public feel something is being done,” says Hutchinson.

The LAPD’s self-control has also been noticed beyond the city.

“The deliberate restraint with which the LAPD has responded to angry protests following the acquittal of George Zimmerman contrasts with law enforcement excesses after the 1992 beating of Rodney King,” says Mary Powers, coordinator for Citizens Alert, a police accountability organization in Chicago, via email.

“We’ve seen a marked improvement in police handling of demonstrations,” she adds. “If such restraint and police protection of community expressions of anger and disappointment with the verdict continues, police and protesters may begin an era where mutual concern for justice bears fruit in a better understanding and cooperation....”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.