George Zimmerman verdict: 'Not guilty' in death of Trayvon Martin

After 17 months, the case of George Zimmerman – charged with shooting unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin – came to a close Saturday night when a jury of six women found Zimmerman not guilty of all charges. The case came to be seen as a parable involving civil rights, racial profiling, racism, gun rights, and the changing definitions of self-defense in public places.

Joe Burbank/REUTERS
George Zimmerman (R) is congratulated by his defense team after being found not guilty in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin at the Seminole County Criminal Justice Center in Sanford, Florida, July 13, 2013. Zimmerman was acquitted of all charges.
Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel/AP
The parents of Trayvon Martin, Tracy Martin, left, and Sybrina Fulton, arrive for George Zimmerman trial in Seminole Circuit Court, in Sanford, Fla., Monday, July 8, 2013.

A jury of six Florida women ranging in age from their 30s to their 60s found George Zimmerman not guilty late Saturday of murdering unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin last year, in the process underscoring the high value at least these six jurors placed on self-defense.

“You have no further business with the court,” Judge Debra Nelson told George Zimmerman, a former neighborhood watch captain, after a 16-hour deliberation marked by a brief, unresolved question from the jury about a lesser charge of manslaughter included in the jury instructions.

After what became a 17-month national ordeal, emotional, even angry reaction broke out on the lawn of the Seminole county Courthouse where the trial took place.

Police authorities had voiced concerns about civil unrest because of the sensitive nature of the trial – which was widely seen as the case of an innocent black youth gunned down by an armed neighborhood vigilante, who has now walked scot-free. (Five of the six jurors were white.)

The case also came to be seen as a parable involving civil rights, racial profiling, racism, gun rights, and the changing definitions of self-defense in public places, brought about by liberalization of gun laws in Florida and other states.

The shooting and its aftermath also had strong political overtones, given that President Obama weighed in, noting that, “If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon,” as well as the involvement of the US Justice Department in an investigation that finally led a special state prosecutor to reverse a decision by the Sanford Police Department to not charge Zimmerman with any crime.

It was that decision to originally not charge Zimmerman, echoed on media platforms and from pulpits by civil rights leaders, that brought national attention to the case, forcing the dismissal of the Sanford Police Chief and causing eventual charges to be filed against Zimmerman, 44 days after Trayvon’s death, for second degree murder.’

In a widely watched and debated trial that became part criminal procedural, part civics lesson, prosecutors alleged Zimmerman had “hate in his heart” when he profiled, followed, then confronted an innocent teenager walking back to where his father was staying

But defense attorney Mark O’Mara claimed Martin wasn’t unarmed, but in fact used a concrete sidewalk to injure Zimmerman enough to justify the armed man unholstering his Kel-Tec 9 mm pistol and fire it up and into Trayvon’s chest, causing him to utter, “You got me,” and then fall away and onto his face.

“[Zimmerman] is innocent, because he acted in self-defense,” Mr. O’Mara said in his closing argument.

The state argued that Zimmerman put Trayvon’s death into motion when he followed him into a dark area between several row houses in the Retreat at Twin Lakes gated neighborhood, and that it was Trayvon who had the right to defend himself against an armed adult stranger. They said Zimmerman lied, prevaricated, and exaggerated his case, fueled by knowledge he had gained from several criminal justice classes he had taken where self-defense laws were discussed.

Prosecutor John Guy said in the state’s final word that the case defined an important boundary in the social compact: Whether an adult can chase a child and then kill that child if he fights back.

But the jury did not see the law and the facts before them that way, focusing ultimately on the moments before Trayvon’s death, when he was straddling Zimmerman, whom several eyewitnesses said had run out of options.

The tension the jury had to resolve was the apparent right to self-defense versus the idea of “culpable neglect” embodied in the lesser charge of manslaughter.

“If he was flat on his back and getting the mud pounded out of him and if he was in reasonable fear of his life, then … the verdict is not guilty, no matter what stupidity he engaged in to get himself to that point,” says Bob Dekle, a University of Florida law professor. But a manslaughter verdict, he argues, could also have been defensible as fair and well-reasoned.

The verdict will be seen as a clear defeat for those who staunchly believed Zimmerman bore some responsibility for Trayvon’s death. It’s likely to be seen as a broad victory for the expansion of self-defense rights in many states, a trend largely begun in Florida, where the shooting took place.

Michael Flamm, a historian at Ohio Wesleyan University who studies civil unrest, told the Monitor this week that there’s small potential for civil unrest in the wake of a case that polarized America beyond the hard and circumstantial evidence, which ultimately did not illuminate what ultimately happened between a man and a teenager on a dark, rainy Florida night.

“Zimmerman is not a police officer, he’s not an agent of the state,” which are the usual requirements for civil unrest in the wake of a criminal trial, says Mr. Flamm. “But there are a lot of nuances in this case, and of course in any civil disorder and unrest nuances tend to get swept aside very quickly. The details of the case don’t matter, the symbolic significant of the case matters most.”

The immediate reaction to the verdict from the prosecutors and defense attorneys arguing the case was subdued.

Said Zimmerman lawyer Don West: "There are no winners here, there are no monsters."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to George Zimmerman verdict: 'Not guilty' in death of Trayvon Martin
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today