US loses track of terrorists in witness protection: Poor data sharing blamed

The Justice Department inspector general found 'significant deficiencies' in the handling of known or suspected terrorists under the federal government's witness protection program.

|
Carolyn Kaster/AP
Attorney General Eric Holder testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington Wednesday before the House Judiciary Committee. The Justice Department's inspector general has found "significent deficiencies" in the department's handling of suspected terrorists under the witness protection program.

The US has lost track of two known or suspected terrorists given identities under the federal witness protection program, according to a Justice Department audit that indicated the program was so poorly monitored the department didn't even know how many such individuals were in it.

Specifically, the new identities of individuals who had cooperated in terrorism investigations were not properly shared with other agencies, the Justice Department’s inspector general reported Thursday. As a result, some known or suspected terrorists in the witness protection program who were on the federal "no-fly" list were allowed to travel on commercial flights.

“We found significant deficiencies in the handling of known or suspected terrorists who were admitted into the WitSec [witness security] Program,” the Justice Department’s watchdog agency found. “Therefore, it was possible for known or suspected terrorists to fly on commercial airplanes in or over the United States and evade one of the government’s primary means of identifying and tracking terrorists’ movements and actions.”

In the middle of the inspector general's investigation last year, the US Marshalls Service (which oversees the WitSec Program) acknowledged that “one individual was and the other individual was believed to be residing outside of the United States.”

The audit also found that the Justice Department “did not definitively know how many known or suspected terrorists were admitted into the WitSec program.” The department says now it has since identified and located all such individuals.

Since its inception in 1971, some 18,300 witnesses, family members, and other associates of witnesses have received identity protection – relocated with new names – under the program. As of a year ago, there were approximately 700 active participants in the program. Witnesses typically testify in cases involving organized crime, drug trafficking, gang activity, and terrorism.

“Over the last two decades, [WitSec] has been a key tool in thwarting planned attacks and prosecuting those responsible for some of the worst acts of terrorism in American history, including the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, and the 2009 New York City subway suicide-bomb plot,” the Justice Department said in a statement Thursday.

“All WitSec participants undergo careful vetting before being admitted into the program, including a complete psychological evaluation and consideration of the witness’s value to the underlying prosecution, the nature of the threat against the witness and the potential risk to the relocation community,” the Justice Department states. “The number of former known or suspected terrorists ever admitted into the WitSec Program represents a fraction of one percent of the total WitSec population, and the vast majority were admitted into the program prior to Sept. 11, 2001. To date, the FBI has not identified a national security threat tied to the participation of terrorism-linked witnesses in the WitSec program.”

Nevertheless, the Justice Department did not dispute the IG’s findings, agreeing that “the suitability and monitoring requirements … should be enhanced for terrorism-linked witnesses,” as the department put it in its official response to the report.

Department officials say they have now “identified, located, and minimized the threat of all former known or suspected terrorists admitted into the WitSec Program during its 40-year history” and taken “significant action” as recommended by the watchdog agency.

Among other things, the department has named an experienced prosecutor to review policies, begun developing a master list of all former known or suspected terrorists, and mandated that information about terrorism-linked applicants to the witness protection program be shared among the Criminal Division’s Office of Enforcement Operations, the US Marshalls Service, the FBI, and the Terrorist Screening Center.

The sharing of information among intelligence and law enforcement agencies was a problem in the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks and more recently in the Boston Marathon bombing.

This latest revelation comes at a time when the Obama administration is already mired in three other politically damaging issues: the terrorist attack on a US diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya; IRS targeting of tea party and other conservative organizations; and a Justice Department probe of Associated Press phone records.

Congressional Republicans were quick to pounce on terrorists and the witness protection program.

“This is gross mismanagement – pure and simple – that jeopardizes American lives and cannot be tolerated,” US Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R) of Virginia, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement Thursday. “The House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on this outrageous problem within DOJ in the near future.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to US loses track of terrorists in witness protection: Poor data sharing blamed
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2013/0516/US-loses-track-of-terrorists-in-witness-protection-Poor-data-sharing-blamed
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe