Why US allies still want to cooperate despite the alleged leak by Trump

One Japanese government official said it was simply not possible to stop cooperating with Washington on intelligence matters.  

Yuri Gripas/Reuters
US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, right, talks to the media next to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov before their meeting at the State Department in Washington, May 10, 2017.

President Trump's alleged disclosure of highly classified information to Russia's foreign minister is unlikely to stop allies who share intelligence with Washington from cooperating, officials said on Tuesday.

Some experts added, however, that the reports could undermine trust between partners.

In a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak, Mr. Trump disclosed intelligence about a planned Islamic State operation, which was supplied by a US ally, two officials with knowledge of the situation said.

The name of the ally or intelligence-sharing operation was not disclosed.

The White House declared the allegations, first reported by The Washington Post, incorrect. Interfax news agency quoted the Russian foreign ministry saying they were "fake."

Two of Washington's allies in the intelligence-sharing network known as "Five Eyes" – which groups the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand – played down the impact on their relationship with Washington.

Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull told a radio station in Adelaide he would maintain "my normal circumspection and discretion" on classified matters, adding the alliance with the United States "is the bedrock of our national security."

Trump and Mr. Turnbull met last week aboard a decommissioned aircraft carrier in New York City after beginning their relations with a testy phone call in February.

New Zealand Foreign Minister Gerry Brownlee noted the story had been denied.

"The media reports have been rejected by senior US officials who were in the meeting," he said in an email via his spokeswoman. "If there is ever to be a resolution of the dreadful situation in Syria, it will require concerted efforts from both the US and Russia."

A Japanese government official said it was simply not possible to stop cooperating with Washington on intelligence matters.

"If the report is true and Mr. Trump is an untrustworthy person, it doesn't necessarily mean that we don't share information with the US anymore," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

While the president has the authority to disclose even the most highly classified information at will, in this case he did so without consulting the ally that provided it, which threatens to jeopardize a long-standing intelligence-sharing agreement, the two US officials said.

'Serious jeapardy'

National security analysts said relations could be damaged.

"Effectively, Trump's actions have thrown world's most important intel sharing relationship into doubt at best, serious jeopardy at worst," Stephanie Carvin, a former national security analyst for the Canadian government, said on Twitter, referring to the "Five Eyes" arrangement.

James Curran, professor of foreign policy at the University of Sydney, said the intelligence relationships were too important and productive to be damaged by Trump's alleged disclosures to the Russians.

"No real practical impact, but I do think it will raise more eyebrows about this president's style and his cavalier attitude to this type of thing," said Curran.

Over the long term, however, such behavior "can potentially have very serious consequences for America's intelligence relationships across the world," Curran said.

Rhys Ball, who formerly worked for New Zealand's intelligence service and is now a Massey University security and defense analyst, said he thought it would be "business as usual" for the "Five Eyes" community.

"Clearly someone has gulped at what was discussed or exchanged. But this might be the new norm when it comes to the United states and its attitude and foreign policy approach to the likes of the Russians," Ball said.

Even before Trump's meeting with the Russians, Washington's intelligence partners abroad have noted a barrage of reports around Trump, the Russians and spies.

They include the investigations into his election campaign's ties to Moscow, probes into Russian interference in the election, the president's own expressions of disdain for the US intelligence community and his claim that former President Barack Obama spied on him, citing a media report that Britain's spy agency GCHQ was behind the surveillance.

"Five Eyes is far too significant for anyone to wash their hands of it and Five Eyes has weathered a few storms over the years," Ball said. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why US allies still want to cooperate despite the alleged leak by Trump
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today