Al Qaeda raid in Yemen: Civilians 'likely killed' in Trump's first counterterror op, Pentagon says

The raid, the first counterterrorism operation under President Trump, resulted in the death of one US commando. Several civilians were also killed, according to local medics. 

Jonathan Ernst/ Reuters
President Trump arrives aboard the Marine One to greet the remains of a US military commando killed during a raid on the Al Qaeda militant group in southern Yemen on Sunday, at Dover Air Force Base, Dover, Delaware, on February 1, 2017.

A weekend raid in Yemen's Bayda province against Al Qaeda, the first counter-terrorism operation approved by President Trump, which resulted in the death of one American commando and 14 militants, "likely killed" civilian noncombatants, the US military said Wednesday.

On Sunday, Mr. Trump claimed that the operation against Al Qaeda had been a success, saying that SEAL Team 6, along with elite soldiers from the United Arab Emirates, had captured "important intelligence that will assist the US in preventing terrorism against its citizens and people around the world."

Initially, Pentagon officials had claimed there were no civilian casualties involved with the operation. But pictures of bodies began to circulate on social media in the aftermath of the raid, and on Wednesday, the Pentagon said that civilians, including children, had likely been killed.

The mission reportedly had two aims: to detain Yemeni tribal leaders who had been working with Al Qaeda and to acquire phones and laptops for intelligence purposes. Plans for the raid had been reviewed and postponed late in the Obama administration, partially because the next moonless night, the perfect time to conduct a commando raid, would not come until after the end of his term, according to The New York Times.

"We really struggled with getting the White House comfortable with getting boots on the ground in Yemen," a former senior defense official familiar with prior operations in Yemen told The Washington Post. "Since the new administration has come in, the approvals [at the Pentagon] appear to have gone up." The official called this weekend's raid "overdue."

Yet another military official expressed doubt that the "minimal" on-the-ground surveillance in the area had adequately prepared the commando team for the operation.

"The decision was made ... to leave it to the incoming administration, partly in the hope that more and better intelligence could be collected," that official told Reuters.

Once on the ground, the team encountered unexpectedly large resistance from Al Qaeda fighters manning a base fortified with landmines and snipers. The base had also been tipped off to their arrival, possibly by the noise of drones flying lower than usual prior to the operation, according to The New York Times.

The unexpectedly intense fighting involved a hard landing of a $70 million MV-22 Osprey aircraft that had to be destroyed and led to the death of Chief Special Warfare Operator William "Ryan" Owens.

According to the Pentagon, 14 Al Qaeda fighters were killed in the operation. The exact number of civilian casualties is still under investigation, though medics at the scene said that 30 people had been killed, including 10 women and children.

Among the reported civilian casualties was eight-year-old Nawar Al-Awlaki, the daughter of US-born Al Qaeda propagandist Anwar Al-Awlaki, who was killed during a drone strike in 2011. Nasser Al-Awlaki, Nawar's grandfather, said that he did not think that her death was intentional.

The Yemeni government, now in exile as the country's nearly two-year civil war continues, was sending weapons to his relatives in order to fight Houthi rebels, Al-Awlaki told The Guardian. 

"If the Americans assumed that those arms were going to the hands of al-Qaida or something, I don't know," he said. "I cannot understand why the Americans use this big commando strike, which is similar to what happened to Osama bin Laden, in a small village in Yemen."

People who sprang up to fight were not doing so because they were Al Qaeda fighters, but because they were defending themselves, including women, he said.

According to US officials, however, the women fighting back had taken up positions indicative of some kind of combat training.

"There were a lot of female combatants who were part of this," Defense Department spokesman Capt. Jeff Davis told reporters, according to The New York Times. "We saw during this operation as it was taking place that female fighters ran to pre-established positions as though they'd been trained to be ready and trained to be combatants."

This article contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.