Trump to sign executive order on building Mexican border wall

President Trump moves to encourage construction of the wall, but will it accomplish what supporters hope?

Jose Luis Gonzalez/Reuters/File
Children play at a newly built section of the U.S.-Mexico border wall at Sunland Park, N.M, opposite the Mexican border city of Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, in November 2016. President Trump has said he will issue an executive order to build up the wall along the Mexican border on Wednesday.

President Donald Trump is taking concrete steps to fulfill his signature campaign promise: a physical wall (or fence) along the US southern border.

The executive order to kick off construction will form part of an immigration package that also includes a 30-day ban on refugees from certain Muslim-majority countries, a measure to defund so-called sanctuary cities, and a new policy to immediately jail anyone caught attempting to cross the border into the United States illegally, two administration officials told the AP.

Mr. Trump previewed the coming policy shifts with a tweet.

He is expected to sign the initial executive orders into law on Wednesday during a visit to the Department of Homeland Security, with further announcements to follow in the coming days.

Another memorable campaign promise – that Mexico will pay for the wall – requires more than just a stroke of a pen, but Mexico already faces an uncertain future regarding US trade relations. Facilitated by the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), 80 percent of Mexico’s exports end up in America’s sizable market. Trump’s threat of a 35-percent tariff on Mexican imports could prove disastrous for Mexico's economy. From Mexico's perspective, renegotiating the current trade agreement may represent the lesser of two evils.

One area for compromise, according to two Mexican government officials, may be regulations known as “rules of origin,” which often determine import taxes. As things stand now, Mexican-made vehicles can enter the US tax free, as long they contain at least 62.5 percent American parts, by value. Such rules help American companies and Mexican factories compete with car manufacturers overseas.

“What we want is to maintain free access for Mexican products, without restrictions, without tariffs and quotas,” Luis Videgaray Caso, Mexico's secretary of foreign affairs, told Reuters.

Tweaking these rules may result in conditions more favorable for American companies, which could satisfy Trump. Nevertheless, it remains to be seen how far NAFTA's leverage extends, with Mexico warning that it may withdraw from the deal if negotiations are unfavorable.

Funding issues aside, many wonder if the wall is feasible. Architects have said that construction of such a barrier would be “nearly impossible.” Fencing already covers over 650 miles of border, but logistics such as a 1970 agreement with Mexico prohibiting the blockage of rivers complicate plans to expand.

Furthermore, many are asking if a wall would accomplish its proposed goals of stopping immigration and protecting American jobs. Writing in The Conversation, David Cook Martín, a professor of sociology at Grinnell College warns that the wall is a simplistic solution to a host of complicated problems. To name one, half of undocumented migrants are people who have overstayed their visas, not ones who illegally crossed the border.

Additionally, the problems that accompany such a massive undertaking prevent the wall from being a silver-bullet solution. Requiring three times the concrete of the Hoover Dam, the costs would be astronomical. Dr. Martín estimated that current, more modest, barriers cost countries billions of dollars in federal support. He’s also found that they don’t necessarily stop immigration. Rather, they encourage more immigrants to cross at dangerous unwalled places, where construction would prove difficult, resulting in more deaths.  

Globalization isn’t the only enemy to American companies. Despite losing 5 million factory jobs since 2005, US manufacturing is at an all-time high. The culprit? Domestic automation, not overseas workers, accounts for 88 percent of lost jobs.

Ultimately, Martín argues that physical barriers are something of an anachronism in our intricately connected world. As he writes: “[W]alling the world distracts citizens and policymakers from complex problems. Extreme economic inequality, global conflict and environmental decline surpass the borders and capacities of any single country.”

This report includes material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Trump to sign executive order on building Mexican border wall
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today