America helped pull Colombia back from the brink. Now what?

American aid was crucial in helping Colombia defeat a decades-long insurgency. The question is what role the US should play now.

Carolyn Kaster/AP
President Obama meets with Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos Thursday in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington.

After 15 years and $10 billion, the United States aid program known as Plan Colombia has helped put the country on the verge of peace for the first time in more than half a century.

The Colombian government is in the final stages of peace negotiations with rebels from the FARC, the last major guerrilla group fighting in Colombia’s war. The two parties are expected to sign a final peace accord at the end of March. 

So as Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos takes a victory lap in Washington this week, the question is: What is Washington’s role now?

Mr. Santos wants to keep the money flowing. But there are questions about whether an aid program built to defeat a rebel insurgency can be changed to consolidate peace.

Not everyone is confident that it can. But the price of not trying could be worse, some say.

At a time when the US is trying to help other states on the verge of failure, its decade-and-a-half partnership with Colombia is an important example of when intervention worked, some regional experts say. If the US can get the next phase right, and help prevent backsliding, they add, it could send a positive message.

“Colombia has been a success story, and there haven’t been too many of those recently, if you look at Iraq and Afghanistan and so forth,” says Michael Shifter, president of the Inter-American Dialogue in Washington. “So in the future, in other circumstances where the opportunity or need for collaboration presents itself, I think [the US] wants to be able to point to this as a collaboration that worked.“

In recent years, annual US assistance to Colombia has been in the $300 million range, down from a high of $1 billion in the darkest years when, as even Santos acknowledges, Colombia was on the verge of becoming a failed state.

Obama is expected to propose increasing annual assistance to $500 million. But the path for shifting from what has largely been a security and drug-interdiction program – with emphasis on building the Colombian armed forces – is not obvious.

Even Santos joked at one of his Washington stops Wednesday that Plan Colombia has left his country in possession of the second-largest fleet of Black Hawk helicopters in the world (after the US, of course).

Some longtime critics of Plan Colombia and its military emphasis say the US has the opportunity to help heal the country’s deep social divides – returning Colombians displaced by war to their homes and achieving justice for the war’s victims, for instance.

The years of Plan Colombia have corresponded with a rise in human rights abuses, note the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) and the Latin America Working Group Education Fund.

“The coming years will give the United States a chance to improve on [past] failures,” the two groups said in a joint statement.

US assistance should now focus on improving human rights and labor rights for minority and indigenous communities, extending services and education to “neglected” areas of the country, and encouraging the US-trained armed forces to transition away from a focus on internal security to external defense.

The two groups also want the US to encourage the Colombian government to press for a peace deal with the last holdout from the peace process, the ELN guerrilla group.

But others say it is unlikely the US will completely shift away from drug interdiction efforts. Colombia remains the world’s largest producer of coca, the raw material for cocaine, and the country’s coca production is rising. Santos repeatedly underscores the threat of organized crime taking over the drug trade the FARC once controlled.    

“I sense an openness in Washington to shifting the emphasis [of US aid] from what it has been, but as Santos said, there are still serious problems” in the areas that Plan Colombia traditionally addressed, says Mr. Shifter of the Inter-American Dialogue.

Beyond that, he adds, is the pressure to use that money for other needs.

“The US has stood with Colombia for 15 years,” Shifter says. “With everything else that’s going on in the world and all the priorities the US has to juggle, I just don’t know how long this [support] can last.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to America helped pull Colombia back from the brink. Now what?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today