Five reasons Indian Prime Minister Modi's dinner with Obama matters

President Obama's private dinner with new Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi Monday might will be an opportunity for both Mr. Modi and Mr. Obama to address key issues to both countries. Here are five:

5. The rising Indian-American community

Jason DeCrow/AP
Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India is reflected in a glass barrier as he gives a speech during a reception by the Indian community in honor of his visit to the United States at Madison Square Garden Sunday in New York.

It may be hard to imagine a world leader selling out New York’s Madison Square Garden, but Modi did it Sunday – with a dazzling Bollywood-style show at which the Indian leader called on the Indian-American community to help him build a prosperous India. With 20,000 wildly enthusiastic Indian-Americans in attendance, it was reportedly the largest draw ever by a foreign leader in the US.

But Indian-Americans are not of interest to Modi alone. Indian-Americans now constitute the third-largest immigrant group in the US, while the incomes of Indian-American households are roughly double the US average. As a result Obama, too, has an interest – and perhaps with midterms looming, a particular political interest – in reaching the influential group.

So in their White House comments, both leaders are likely to invoke the vital role that Indian-Americans will play in building ties between the two countries.

And, as Modi vaunts the many contributions Indians have brought to the US, don’t be surprised if the Indian leader makes the case for more Americans to take up yoga.

In his UN speech, Modi called on the world body to adopt an “International Yoga Day,” saying more yoga practiced worldwide would be an effective way to address climate change. In the same vein, he may find a moment while in Washington to advise Americans that “changing our lifestyle and creating consciousness,” as he said at the UN, is key to changing the world.

5 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.