Gaza cease-fire: Did it help that US was taking a diplomatic breather?

The 72-hour humanitarian cease-fire in Gaza, announced jointly by Kerry in India and the UN's Ban Ki-moon, had some in the Middle East thinking the US breather was a good idea.

Lucas Jackson/Ap
US Secretary of State John Kerry announces a 72-hour humanitarian cease-fire beginning Friday between Israel and Hamas, in New Delhi, India, Friday. During the 72-hour cease-fire there will be negotiations on a more durable truce in the 24-day-old Gaza war, the United States and United Nations announced.

Are the chances of Israel and Hamas reaching a durable cease-fire in their devastating war better without the United States in the thick of it?

A week after Secretary of State John Kerry’s fruitless foray into shuttle diplomacy, the announcement late Thursday of a 72-hour humanitarian cease-fire had some in the Middle East thinking so.

In a statement issued jointly by Secretary Kerry, on a trip to India, and United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, the UN said it received “assurances” from “all parties” that they would observe a three-day cease-fire beginning Friday morning.

The statement said that during the cease-fire “the forces on the ground will remain in place” – meaning Israeli forces in Gaza would remain, a key Israeli demand for accepting a cease-fire. As soon as a calm in the fighting takes hold, Israeli and Palestinian negotiators are to go to Cairo for talks aimed at a longer-term agreement to end the fighting.

Egypt, which from the beginning of the conflict suggested regional players were up to handling this one, emerges as a key broker in the cease-fire arrangements. Egypt continued its diplomatic efforts Thursday, hosting Israeli officials to discuss cease-fire ideas.

Before Thursday’s cease-fire announcement, some regional experts warned that the diplomatic vacuum left by the US absence could encourage hardliners on both sides to seize the opportunity to impose their positions. Instead of a cease-fire, they said, Israel could opt to reoccupy the Gaza Strip, Hamas would continue to hone its guerrilla warfare, and already high casualties would likely soar on both sides.

Those concerns have not evaporated as a result of the 72-hour humanitarian ceasefire, and pressure to return to fighting could easily resume.

Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman is calling for the Israeli military to be authorized to “go all the way” to reoccupy Gaza and wipe out Hamas’s fighters and local leadership. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is said to be resisting that option, although earlier Thursday he vowed to destroy all of the Hamas-built tunnels leading into Israel “with or without a cease-fire.”

Also on Thursday the Israeli government called up 16,000 reservists – a move that fueled speculation that the ground war was indeed about to be widened. Israeli military officials said, however, that the reservists would relieve an equal number of soldiers already fighting.

In the meantime, the US appeared to be taking something of a diplomatic breather, even as Kerry, in New Delhi for a long-scheduled US-India “strategic dialogue,” was a co-announcer of the cease-fire.

Kerry, who had been skewered by the Israeli media and some US critics for an earlier cease-fire proposal deemed weak on disarming Hamas, sounded ever-so-slightly relieved at being out of the Middle East snake pit, though not very confident that real progress would be made.

“I think everybody would feel better if there was a bona fide effort to try” to get to a cease-fire and negotiations on the issues underlying the conflict, he said before the cease-fire announcement, but added that there was “no promise” of a quick end to the fighting ending its fourth week.

The US this week authorized replenishment of Israel’s supply of grenades and mortar rounds depleted in its Gaza offensive, while Congress is pushing to add hundreds of millions of dollars to funding for Iron Dome, the antimissile missile system credited with knocking most of Hamas’s rockets heading toward Israeli cities out of the sky.

At the same time the White House issued a stinging rebuke of Israel Thursday for its shelling the day before of a UN-run school-turned-shelter for thousands of Palestinians, calling the action “totally indefensible.”

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the US “is asking the Israelis … in fact urging the Israelis … to do more to live up to the standards that they have set for their own military operations to protect the lives of innocent civilians.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.