Venezuela expels three US diplomats, alleging sabotage plot

Venezuela President Maduro, in a move from the playbook of former President Hugo Chávez, charges that US diplomats engaged in an 'imperialist' plot to sabotage the electric grid.

Courtesy of Miraflores Palace/Reuters
Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro, here speaking during an event in Coro in the state of Falcon on Sept. 30, said on Monday he was expelling the top US diplomat in the South American nation and two others, accusing them of meeting with opposition leaders and encouraging 'acts of sabotage' against his country. He has given the diplomats 48 hours to leave.

For anyone who worried that the death of Hugo Chávez last year might mean less colorful fireworks between Venezuela and the United States, never fear: Nicolás Maduro has taken charge of the anti-American mantle with gusto.

In an act that would have no doubt earned a tip of the fiery Mr. Chávez’s red beret, President Maduro on Monday ordered the expulsion of three US diplomats, charging them with an “imperialist” plot against Venezuela.

And not just any plot. According to Maduro, the chargé d’affaires of the US Embassy in Caracas and two other diplomats had been caught conspiring to sabotage the electrical grid and to “shut down all of Venezuela.” He accused the US diplomats of discussing their plot in meetings with Venezuela’s right-wing political opposition.

Appearing on national TV, Maduro shouted in English, “Yankees, go home!”

Maduro’s order – and especially going on national TV to announce it – was reminiscent of Chávez, who ruled for 14 years until last March by periodically spicing up his populist-leftist platform with anti-American rhetoric and actions.

Like Maduro’s accusation of electrical sabotage, Chávez’s rants against a meddling America could seem outlandish – but carried a suspicion of credibility, especially domestically and after the George W. Bush administration appeared to act in support of an unsuccessful coup attempt against Chávez in 2002.

Maduro’s charges of an American diplomatic plot hit as the US continues to face blowback from revelations this summer of extensive National Security Agency (NSA) e-mail spying and Internet monitoring operations across Latin America. Last week Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff blasted the US over its international spying operations against Brazilian officials, businesses, and citizens in a speech to the United Nations General Assembly, and this week a group of Mercosur countries met in Caracas to come up with information security measures.

The US has not had an ambassador in Caracas since 2010, and Monday’s diplomatic dust-up seems likely to sink relations even further. Some members of Congress were quick to call for reciprocal steps against Venezuela.

“President Maduro’s expulsion of our embassy personnel continues a well worn pattern of measures designed to shore up his weak political hand and distract Venezuelans from the serious problems they face at home,” said Rep. Eliot Engel of New York, the senior Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, in a statement Tuesday. “His use of diplomatic personnel to score political points is unacceptable and should not go unanswered.”

The US Embassy in Caracas rejected Maduro’s accusations and insisted that any meetings its personnel have had were “normal diplomatic engagements” as part of “regular contacts across the Venezuelan political spectrum.”

“We completely reject the Venezuelan government’s allegations of US government involvement in any type of conspiracy to destabilize the Venezuelan government,” the Embassy said in a statement.

The diplomats ordered out of the country were Kelly Keiderling, the chargé d’affaires, Vice-Consul David Moo, and Elizabeth Hoffman of the Embassy’s political section. Maduro had already made a public case against Ms. Hoffman as far back as April, speaking then of her meetings with the opposition and alluding to a plot against Venezuela’s electrical power distribution system.

With his high-profile expulsion of US diplomats, Maduro is acting on a lesson learned from his political mentor, Chávez, Latin America analysts say: Distract the masses from the bad and deteriorating economic conditions around them with a good Yankee imperialist plot.

The problem for the US, some analysts add, is that the US has done its share to make the plots believable – with actions, for example, like the NSA spying operations.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Venezuela expels three US diplomats, alleging sabotage plot
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today