Rand Paul as kingmaker in US Senate race in Montana?

Sen. Rand Paul (R) – heir to his father's libertarian political dynasty – on Sunday endorsed Republican Denny Rehberg, who is running in a tight three-man race. A GOP concern is that the Constitution Party candidate could siphon votes from Rehberg. 

John Huff, Foster's Daily Democrat/AP
U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., makes a stop at the University of New Hampshire to energize student Republicans in support of Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Saturday, Oct. 20, 2012 in Durham, N.H.

Could Sen. Rand Paul (R) of Kentucky make the difference in the squeaky-tight US Senate race in Montana?

Senator Paul, heir to the libertarian political dynasty built by his father,  Ron Paul, endorsed the Republican Senate candidate in the Big Sky State, Rep. Denny Rehberg (R), on Sunday. The Ron Paul-lead Liberty PAC had previously endorsed Representative Rehberg.

“I support Denny Rehberg and encourage you to do the same, because a vote for anyone other than Denny Rehberg is a vote to keep [majority leader] Harry Reid and his liberal allies in control of the U.S. Senate,” Rand Paul said in a recorded message distributed by the Rehberg campaign.

That "anyone other than" Rehberg is not just a reference to Democratic incumbent Sen. Jon Tester. It also refers to third-party candidate Dan Cox, who is carrying the libertarian banner in the election and who could siphon enough votes from Rehberg to hand the race to Senator Tester. 

The libertarian party’s presidential nominee, former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, has endorsed Mr. Cox. Cox, who runs an online fishing supplies company, is formally running as the Constitution Party candidate.

Tester, a farmer from Big Sandy, Mont., won his seat in 2006 by the fewest votes of any US Senate race that year. The 2012 contest looks to be just as close.

The Rand “endorsement indicates more that the Rehberg folks take locking down that vote seriously than anything else,” wrote David Parker, a professor at Montana State University who is writing a book about the race, in an e-mail to the Monitor. “Will it matter? Hard to say.”

The Tester campaign believes Cox could be a secret weapon. An anti-Rehberg group, Montana Hunters and Anglers Leadership Fund, recently put $500,000 behind an advertisement touting Cox as the “real conservative” in the race. 

The Montana Republican Party, for its part, has filed a Federal Elections Commission complaint alleging that environmental groups backing Tester did not properly disclose their funding of a pro-Cox piece of political mail. 

The race has been a nip-and-tuck contest all the way through. Rehberg holds a 49 percent to 45 percent edge over Tester in a Mason-Dixon poll released Sunday, just within the poll’s margin of error of 4 percentage points. Cox took 1 percent, and undecided voters clocked in at 5 percent. A Public Policy Polling survey released Sunday night showed Tester with a two-point advantage.

The Real Clear Politics rolling average of polls, however, shows Rehberg with a miniscule edge of 0.4 percentage point.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Rand Paul as kingmaker in US Senate race in Montana?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today