Obama or Romney? How 5 undecided voters are making up their minds.

Last month, the Monitor profiled five undecided voters whose allegiances were especially prized because they live in swing states. Now, less than two weeks before Election Day, we check in with them to see what they’re thinking now.

Tricia Halliday, Bedford, N.H.

Melanie Stetson Freeman/Staff
Tricia Halliday

Occupation: administrative assistant at a college

Personal: married with two daughters

2008 vote: John McCain

Back in September, registered Republican Tricia Halliday was building a mental checklist of pros and cons to see which presidential candidate was “weighted more closely to my heart.”

She found her answer on the night of the first debate between Obama and Romney.

“It just seemed a clear decision to me that [Romney’s] thoughts are more in line with mine,” Ms. Halliday says. “I thought it revealed that Obama was weak in several areas, mostly financial in that debate.”

Nothing happened in the subsequent debates to change her mind, and she thinks it’s highly unlikely that anything else will sway her between now and Election Day.

Balancing the federal budget is one of her top priorities for the nation, but the decision “does come down to personal things,” she says.

“I’m not better off than I was four years ago. Obama is not better for my family,” Halliday elaborates. “Is Romney going to fix everything? I highly doubt it. But I think he has a better shot, and I’m not willing to cast another vote for four years like the past four years.”

Her concerns about Romney as a “flip-flopper” have eased somewhat, though that doesn’t make her an avid supporter. “I have a little more faith in him. Not complete faith,” she says. “It’s not like I’m going out waving flags for him.... Of these two [candidates], this is my choice.”

No longer among the tiny sliver of undecided voters, Halliday is ready to step into the voting booth and await the results. Right now, Obama overall in New Hampshire is ahead by 1.1 points, according to the Oct. 26 RealClearPolitics average.

“Now it’s kind of in God’s hands,” Halliday says. “I’ve taken care of my clear conscience in casting my one vote. That’s my job.”

Stacy Teicher Khadaroo, staff writer

2 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.