Mitt Romney: top 5 attacks on President Obama

Mitt Romney has yet to nail down the Republican presidential nomination, but he’s already well into his critique of President Obama. Here are five of Mr. Romney’s top charges against the incumbent, with a look at whether they’re true or false.

1. Obama wants high gas prices

Steven Senne/AP
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney campaigns in Moline, Ill., Sunday.

At a campaign event on March 18, Mitt Romney repeated a common GOP assertion: President Obama wanted the price of gasoline to go up.

"There's one promise he's kept,” Mr. Romney said at a pancake breakfast in Moline, Ill. “When he campaigned he said he wanted to raise the price of gasoline. He said that under him, energy costs would skyrocket. And then he brought in a trio of people to help him implement those policies.”

Obama, in fact, has never said he wanted higher gas prices, though Energy Secretary Steven Chu once said he thought gas prices should rise to European levels to promote the use and development of alternatives. That was four years ago, when he was director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. On March 13, speaking before a Senate committee, Secretary Chu disavowed that view, saying he wants the price of gasoline to go down.

In January 2008, Obama did say in an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle that his cap-and-trade proposal would cause electricity costs to rise, as noted by NBC News. But he didn’t mention gas prices. 

At a press conference on March 6, Obama was asked if he wanted higher gas prices to help wean the US off carbon fuels. Obama laughed. 

"Just from a political perspective, do you think the president of the United States going into reelection wants gas prices to go up higher?” the president said.

Romney says Obama has gone through an “election-year conversion.”

1 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.