Vice President Mike Pence breaks tied Senate vote in DeVos confirmation

The vice president cast a historic, record-breaking tie vote in the Senate for the cabinet confirmation.

Yuri Gripas/Reuters
Betsy DeVos testifies before the Senate Health, Education and Labor Committee during the confirmation hearing for secretary of Education on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 17, 2017.

The US Senate on Tuesday confirmed Betsy DeVos as secretary of Education, despite unrelenting opposition from the Democratic minority.

The controversial nomination of Ms. DeVos drew opposition from the entire Democratic minority in the Senate, joined by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) of Vermont and Angus King (I) of Maine, as well as two Senate Republicans, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. The 50-50 split necessitated a tie-breaking vote from Vice President Mike Pence, the first time that a vice president has been required to resolve a tie over a cabinet nomination.

In the final lead-up to the senatorial vote, the Democratic minority occupied the floor overnight in order to voice their unrelenting opposition.

Ms. DeVos's strong support of school choice and lack of personal experience with the public school system have made her one of the most controversial of President Trump's appointments.

DeVos’s nomination drew the strongest criticism from labor unions, rights groups, and teaching organizations over her outspoken support of charter schools, which are alternative educational institutions established by parents, teachers, and community members outside of the public school system that still receive government funding.

Proponents of charter schools, such as DeVos, see qualities such as autonomy and innovation as major upsides for students who don’t traditionally excel in the public school system. As Paul Hill, a professor at the University of Washington explained in an interview with NPR, “what they're trying to do is to create options for students who've been in public schools and haven't done well.”

But to many public school advocates, charter schools represent a drain on funding for traditional schools.

As Professor Hill explained, "charter schools are public schools, and the money that the states provide to educate children go to the charter schools of children transferred there." However, he continued, "Basically, there is money that used to be in the hands of the public school system that now goes to charter schools. But it's not more money, it's the same, and in some cases actually less.”

For teachers unions, that means less spending money for traditional schools – a major sticking point for the National Education Association.

Opponents have also raised concerns about DeVos's qualifications for the position, particularly the fact that she never attended public school herself and did not send her children to public schools. They point to her privileged upbringing as demonstrative of a lack of understanding and appreciation for running the financial aid and student loan components of the Department of Education, a point of contention that Washington Post education columnist Jay Matthews describes as "lazy thinking."

"Suggesting that a private school education means you can’t understand and support public schools is lazy thinking," he wrote. "The false image of out-of-touch private schools ignores the creative strength of our nation’s diverse approach to teaching children."

Still, opponents point to her lack of experience in the field of education.

In a recent opinion article published by US News & World Report titled, “Unqualified and Dangerous,” Lisette Partelow and Meg Banner of the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank in Washington, D.C., expressed their concerns over DeVos’s interests and qualifications regarding her proposed responsibilities as secretary of Education, namely that “far too little is known about her understanding of education law and policy, financial interests or agenda for the nation's public schools.”

“Unlike most previous education secretaries," they added, "DeVos has no record of commitment to public education as an educator, administrator or elected official.”

Similar rhetoric has been used by Democratic politicians, especially Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D) of Massachusetts, who in a letter directed toward DeVos said, “there is no precedent for an Education Department Secretary with your lack of experience in public education.”

However, advocates for DeVos’s nomination see her perceived lack of experience as a positive harbinger for change within the US Department of Education.

President Trump referred to his nominee in November as “a brilliant and passionate education advocate,” according to the Associated Press, and Sen. Lamar Alexander (R) of Tennessee, himself a former education Secretary and chairman of the committee that approved DeVos, told The New York Times that she would be “an excellent education secretary.”

“She’s committed to public education, and there’s no better example of that than her work on the most important reform of public schools in the last 30 years: public charter schools,” said Senator Alexander.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Vice President Mike Pence breaks tied Senate vote in DeVos confirmation
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today