National 'report card' shows grades are slipping. Is it credible?

The National Assessment of Educational Progress released the results of their 2015 assessment test, suggesting the gap between proficient and struggling high school students is growing. But is NAEP's one-day test a credible marker of success?

Detroit Free Press/AP
In this undated photo, No. 2 pencils are arranged on a standardized testing bubble answer sheet in Detroit, Mich. Education officials in Michigan are concerned that an increase in testing for high school juniors will lead to problems this spring. Some principals say testing time will nearly be doubled or tripled, from three days of tests to between five and eight days.

The nation’s 'Report Card' is out, and it’s not great news: Reading and math scores slipped for high school seniors

According to the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), an annual multiple choice test taken by thousands of randomly selected 12th grade students across the country, average reading and math scores slightly decreased from 2013. Between 2013 and 2015, the nation’s average mathematics score decreased from 153 to 152 out of total score of 300 and the average reading score decreased from 288 to 287 out of 500. 

But a breakdown of these statistics suggests that educators face more than just stagnation: while the average scores are relatively the same, they also reveal a widening gap between proficient and below-average students. In other words, the top-achieving students are scoring better and the struggling students are scoring worst.  

“There is a gap, a widening of a gap of higher and lower ability students, and I think that’s something we need to think about,” The Education Department’s Peggy Carr, acting commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistic who administers the test, tells the Associated Press. 

Amid the discouraging results, some observers are asking: Does the NAEP matter? 

“In our era of incredibly volatile state and local testing practices, it is our North Star,” Andrew Ho, professor of education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and a member of NAEP’s governing board, tells NPR.

Because regardless of recent controversy over the Common Core tests at the local, state and national levels, NAEP is not in the business of assessing and criticizing state’s educational success. These standardized are tests used to take a nationwide snapshot. And NAEP data goes back decades, with reading results have been recorded since 1993 and math since 2005.  

But if US high school graduation rates are also a barometer of success, then these statistics contradict the recent NAEP report. Whereas the NAEP says only 40 percent of high school students are ready for college, 82 percent of US seniors graduated from high school in 2014 – the highest level since the Department of Education started tracking graduation rates five years ago. 

So why is there such a large gap between what high schools and the NAEP determine as secondary-education-ready? 

As Professor Ho notes to NPR, a diploma recognizes more achievement than just reading and math proficiency. Whereas the NAEP recognizes a student’s success on multiple choice tests on one day of the year, a high school diploma recognizes long-term success in a variety of subjects as well as personal accomplishments such as attendance and determination. 

“And there’s a second issue. Most standardized state tests have a single passing score, known as the cut score,” explains NPR’s Anya Kamenetz. “NAEP slices its results into four categories: Below Basic, Basic, Proficient and Advanced. But, what Ho calls ‘college and career ready’ doesn’t line up perfectly with either the ‘proficient’ or ‘basic’ standard on the NAEP 12th-grade test. Instead, it falls somewhere in between.”

Also encouraging, there was no significant change in math or reading scores for a specific racial or ethnic group. For average math scores, all white, African American, Hispanic and Asian students decreased two percent from 2013 levels. And for average reading scores, both white and African-American students dipped two percent below 2013 levels, while Hispanic students held the same average score and Asian students actually increase by one percent. And while this isn’t entirely positive news, it is reassuring that no individual minority is falling behind the pack. 

“Big change never happens overnight,” then-US Education Secretary Arne Duncan said last year, defending recent nationwide education reform. “I’m confident that over the next decade, if we stay committed to this change, we will see historic improvements.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.