Why Duke University students are calling for college administrators to be fired

Protesters at Duke University have joined the growing ranks of student activists striving to call attention to issues of inequality on campuses across the United States.

The Duke University president’s continuing efforts to end a sit-in outside his office in Durham, N.C., comes amid a snowballing number of student protests on issues of race and inequality around the United States.

Duke President Richard Brodhead met with demonstrators Sunday inside the building that houses his office as they demanded the dismissal of three top-level administrators, including one for an alleged racial slur against a parking attendant.

Student protesters were initially told that they would face criminal charges or academic sanctions if they failed to disband by Sunday. But, as is becoming colleges' more frequent approach, Duke later softened its stance. Late Sunday night, the university issued a statement revoking its warning "in order to facilitate productive dialogue and move towards a peaceful resolution."

The Duke students, including nine who had been camped inside the building since last Friday, are indicative of a broader nationwide reawakening of student activism on campuses. These protests are often calls for greater equality, especially on issues of race.

College campuses have always been active forums for students to engage in social activism, but the increased participation seen in recent years points to a growing frustration with society and college administrators, bolstered by a rise in the number of opportunities for activism and an increase in positive attention given to such protests, Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg, director of CIRCLE, the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement at Tufts University in Medford, Mass., told the Monitor’s Stacy Teicher Khadaroo earlier this year.

As movements like Black Lives Matter gain greater traction and media recognition, student activists have been emboldened to take on college administrations with allegations of racism. These movements are on a scale not seen since the height of the civil rights movements in the 1960s, the Monitor’s Harry Bruinius and Jessica Mendoza wrote last month.

On Monday, Princeton University opened an exhibit seeking to cast its former president in a more balanced light, acknowledging that he harbored racist views alongside his frequently-lauded progressivism.

Among the three administrators the Duke students are demanding be fired is Duke's Executive Vice President Tallman Trask III. The students' complaints about Mr. Trask stem from an accusation from parking attendant Shelvia Underwood, who last month filed a lawsuit accusing him of directing racist comments toward her two years ago.

Trask has denied making any racial comment. He has said Ms. Underwood refused to let him park in his usual spot and stepped in front of his car, causing him to unintentionally hit her

Campus police investigated Underwood's allegations at the time, but she "chose not to pursue her police complaint," Duke said in a statement.

The university's Office of Institutional Equity separately investigated Underwood's allegation of a racial comment, but the investigation "did not produce sufficient evidence to confirm the allegations," according to a statement from the office.

Demonstrators were also demanding that Duke raise the minimum wage for all campus workers to $15.

Duke's current minimum wage is $12 an hour, compared to a federal and North Carolina minimum of $7.50.

This report contains material from the Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.