Controversy in Latino American organization reflects evolving political landscape

The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) has called on their president, Roger Rocha, to resign after Mr. Rocha praised President Trump's immigration plan. LULAC has historically supported immigration control, but its political demographics are changing. 

Tony Gutierrez/AP/File
Manuel Rendon (c.) and other members recite the Pledge of Allegiance at a League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) meeting in February 2008 in Plano, Texas. LULAC is the oldest Latino civil rights organization in the US, and its membership is growing more politically diverse.

The oldest Latino civil rights organization in the United States is facing turmoil over its leader's initial support for President Trump's immigration plan, and it comes amid evolving membership that includes politically active immigrant students.

Until about 10 years ago, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) was known for its efforts to "Americanize" Latino residents following decades of group support for restrictive US immigration policy.

But members say a deep split that emerged last month between some of the group's 132,000 members and its president, Roger Rocha, reflects how the organization known as LULAC has transformed to include immigrant rights as a central feature of its agenda.

"It took a while but LULAC finally got with the times," said Dennis Montoya, the state director of LULAC New Mexico. "Immigrants are an important part of our community."

Mr. Rocha has been under intense pressure to resign after he wrote a letter on Jan. 28 supporting Mr. Trump's border security proposal – including the US-Mexico border wall and a reduction in visas for foreign relatives of US citizens in exchange for greater protections for children in the US who were brought to the country illegally by their parents and parents who overstayed visas.

Rocha later rescinded the letter and called writing it "the worst mistake of my life" but said he will not resign. Some members of the group's 12-member executive board have said they will mount an effort to impeach him next week at a three-day meeting in Washington, D.C.

Mr. Montoya said Rocha should have known that his support for Trump – which was not backed by the group's board – would have been widely viewed as a step backward to positions that the group has not supported for decades.

The group generally supported immigration restrictions in the 1940s and 1950s and a civil rights lawyer, Gus Garcia, who worked with the league held a historic meeting with President Harry Truman in which he asked for a crackdown on immigrants trying to enter the US illegally.

Later, the group sought the reduction of the "Bracero Program" in the 1950s that allowed low-wage Mexican guest workers to work legally in the US before leaving or staying permanently.

Founded in 1929 by World War I veterans, LULAC formed in response to the discrimination that Mexican-American veterans and residents faced in Texas. The group soon expanded to other states and grew even larger after World War II when US soldiers with Mexican roots came back from fighting in Nazi Germany ready to take on segregation.

Unlike mutual aid societies of the time that helped Mexican immigrants in the US, LULAC felt "Americanized" Latinos would be better suited to battle discrimination. Chapter meetings always started with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer attributed to George Washington.

Those "Americanization" efforts continued until the late 1960s when a new generation of activists sought to include immigration reform as part of the group's efforts, California LULAC state director Dave Rodriguez said. And that trend has only intensified in recent years.

"Now this new generation and more young members are speaking out," Mr. Rodriguez said. "The old LULAC is gone."

Jeronimo Cortina, a University of Houston political science professor, cited changing demographics among US Latinos as the main reason for members' anger with Rocha. And most Latinos either have relatives in the US who are in the country illegally or know of people who are.

"Many Latinos now come from mixed-status families," Mr. Cortina said. "So it's no surprise that LULAC members are slowly changing the group."

Some members warn against adopting stances that would favor immigrants over Latinos who are US citizens and those with legal permission to live and work in the country.

Baldomero Garza III, a LULAC district director in Houston, said in a letter to members that the group should "represent the interests of all Americans first," including the more than 40 million US Latinos.

"Let's be crystal clear: Dreamers are foreign citizens in our country," Mr. Garza wrote. "They have taken advantage of our benefits, benefits meant for American citizens."

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Controversy in Latino American organization reflects evolving political landscape
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today