TSA pat-downs are getting more intense under new nationwide regulation

Those subjected to pat-downs at US airports might find the new method invasive, officials say. But they have not disclosed how, exactly, the procedure will change. 

Josh Reynolds/AP/File
A TSA employee checks documents for passengers in line at a security checkpoint at Logan International Airport in Boston, Jan. 6, 2010. The Transportation Security Administration has told local law enforcement officers that security screenings at airports will now include some pat downs that passengers may describe as 'uncomfortable.'

Pat-downs at the airport will become more intimate under new national security guidelines in an effort to improve safety for travelers. 

But it isn't clear just how invasive the new procedure might be. 

Announcing the change last week, a spokesman for the Transportation Security Administration described the new method as more “comprehensive” than past approaches but declined to disclose specifics as to what that would entail for security reasons.

“I would say people who in the past would have gotten a pat-down that wasn’t involved will notice that the [new] pat-down is more involved,” TSA spokesman Bruce Anderson said Friday, according to Bloomberg.

Previously, security agents at United States airports had five approved methods to turn to when conducting a pat-down. The options have been eliminated, leaving all agents nationwide with just one procedure.

The agency alerted local law enforcement to the new procedure, predicting that the method could surprise travelers and spur them to contact local authorities with concerns that TSA agents had violated them.

“Due to this change, TSA asked FSDs [field security directors] to contact airport law enforcement and brief them on the procedures in case they are notified that a passenger believes a [TSA employee] has subjected them to an abnormal screening practice,” Airports Council International-North America wrote in a notice.

The TSA screens some 2 million travelers across the nation each day. For those who trigger the alarm on the imaging scanner, or refuse to walk through, a pat-down becomes a requirement to continue through security. Those subject to the searches can elect to have the procedure in a private area with one companion, or in public view.

The policy change comes after TSA agents failed to uncover concealed mock weapons and explosives in 95 percent of internal tests in 2015. In the tests, Homeland Security officials posed as passengers in airports around the country. They succeeded in smuggling the devices past security in 67 out of 70 trials.

But TSA agents have seen success since, frequently intercepting weapons making their way onto planes with passengers. In 2016, officials uncovered a record number of 3,391 firearms in carry-on luggage or with passengers.

That trend seems to be continuing, as TSA found a record 21 firearms in one day in February.

Some worry that the new policy, or at least its rollout, could slow down security screenings in airports, leading travelers to miss their flights.

It's a different world today,” Chris Petersen, who travels about twice a month, told NBC reporters in San Diego Sunday. “I just want to get to where I'm going.”

But as threats of violence and terror loom, many have expressed support for procedures that bring added safety, even if they can complicate the travel process.

“You're 40,000 feet up in the air, you don't want people bringing in things they shouldn't,” Michelle Scherber, another traveler, told the network.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to TSA pat-downs are getting more intense under new nationwide regulation
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today