Google honors Fred Korematsu, who battled Japanese-American internment

In addition to the four US states marking Fred Korematsu Day, Google is honoring the civil rights figure who opposed internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. 

Courtesy of Google
Google's home page features an illustration of American civil rights activist Fred Korematsu, who battled the United States's policy of interning Japanese Americans during World War II.

Monday marks what would be the 98th birthday of civil rights activist Fred Toyosaburo Korematsu, whose portrait is featured in the Google Doodle of the day. 

Mr. Korematsu, a native of Oakland, Calif., was known for his opposition to Japanese-American internment camps in the United States during World War II. Instead of voluntarily relocating to an internment camp in 1942, when Executive Order 9066 was signed by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Korematsu went into hiding and was consequently arrested.

After Korematsu's conviction was upheld in the US Supreme Court case Korematsu v. United States, he and his family were sent to live in a Utah relocation camp until the end of the war in 1945. In 1983, his conviction was overturned, and in 1998, he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian honor, from President Clinton.

President Ford formally ended Executive Order 9066 in 1976 and apologized for the internment, stating: "We now know what we should have known then – not only was that evacuation wrong but Japanese-Americans were and are loyal Americans."

But the kind of fear that gave rise to the creation of internment camps is not so easily ended, as Curtis Sitomer wrote for The Christian Science Monitor in 1983, before Korematsu's conviction was overturned. More than 30 years later, his words still feel relevant, particularly as some have drawn comparisons between World War II-era fear of Japanese Americans and the current debate over Muslim immigration amid concerns about terrorism: 

Regardless of the court's final ruling, there's the unfinished business of combating racism in America. Its ugly head popped up 40 years ago in the flurry over Japanese-Americans. Since then it has shown itself repeatedly - during the Iranian hostage crisis, for instance, when some observers suggested that Iranian-Americans be taken into custody in retribution for the acts against Americans in Iran, and today in disputes regarding the rights of blacks and Mexican-Americans.

Arguments of the 1940s sound uncannily current: you can't tell a Japanese-American from a Japanese national; in a crisis, they're sure to be loyal to their ethnic roots; surely some Japanese-Americans are part of spy networks transmitting US security data to Tokyo...

Could these events recur today? Unfortunately, yes. People who look ''different'' are still potential targets. It's just too easy - on the flimsiest of evidence - to stereotype groups or identify individuals with political movements and regimes.

Concerns about potential discriminatory treatment of Muslims in America under the Trump administration mounted throughout the president's campaign, as he and members of his team called for measures including a ban on all Muslims entering the country and a national registry for immigrants from countries containing active terrorist groups. Last week, an executive order signed by President Trump temporarily banned all citizens of seven majority-Muslim countries from entering the US, sparking a wave of protests. 

While Mr. Trump has denied advocating for a religion-based registry, prominent Trump supporter Carl Higbie came under fire in November after citing World War II-era Japanese-American internment camps as a "precedent" for an immigrant registry, telling Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly: "We’ve done it based on race, we’ve done it based on religion, we’ve done it based on region. We've done it with Iran back – back a while ago. We did it during World War II with Japanese."

When pressed by Ms. Kelly, Mr. Higbie said he was not advocating for a return to internment camps, but that "we need to protect America first." 

In December 2015, then-presidential candidate Trump told Time that he did not know whether he would have supported the internment of Japanese Americans in the 1940s. 

"I would have had to be there at the time to tell you, to give you a proper answer," he said. "I certainly hate the concept of it. But I would have had to be there at the time to give you a proper answer." 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.