Arizona election law that could help GOP will stay on the books

The Supreme Court granted a stay of a US appeals court ruling that temporarily blocked Arizona from enforcing the law that prohibits advocacy groups from collecting completed early ballots.

Carolyn Kaster/AP/File
The Supreme Court is seen in Washington. The court has ruled that an Arizona law barring third-party ballot collection can remain on the books.

A law that prohibits third-party ballot collection will stay on the books in Arizona for Tuesday’s election, marking a victory for Republicans in the continued legal battle over voter expansion and ballot security.

The Supreme Court granted a stay Friday on an appeals ruling that blocked the law, which bars advocacy groups from conducting get-out-the-vote operations that involve collecting completed ballots and delivering them to the polls.

The legal battle over access to polling has raged throughout the divisive 2016 campaign. As Democrats have advocated for policies that ease access to the polls, like early voting, Republicans have pushed for more regulations to curtail perceived instances of voter fraud by implementing voter ID laws. Amid Donald Trump’s claims that the election is “rigged” against him, the divide has become increasingly evident as his supporters have decried policies they believe benefit Democrats.

The plaintiffs, which include the Democratic National Convention, implored the court to block the law which they say "would expose Arizonans who are presently engaged in ballot collection and do not learn of this court's ruling to a felony conviction and criminal sanctions." They’ve argued that the law plays a role in disenfranchising voters who have a harder time getting to the polls on Election Day.

They stay will remain in place until the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals hears a disposition, which is scheduled to begin with oral arguments in January. In Arizona, polls show Trump holding a slight lead over challenger Hillary Clinton with less than a week left before Election Day.

The case wasn’t the only voting access clash between the two parties in the election’s final days. At a Trump rally in Reno on Saturday, Nevada Republican Chairman Michael McDonald suggested that polling locations in Clark County, which plays home to Las Vegas and a population that is around 30 percent Hispanic, stayed open hours after it should have closed to accommodate a “certain group” of voters who would likely cast Democratic ballots.

"Last night, in Clark County, they kept a poll open 'til 10 o'clock at night so a certain group could vote," he said. "The polls are supposed to close at 7. This was kept open until 10. Yeah, you feel free right now? You think this is a free and easy election? That's why it's important."

A spokesperson for the county said that polling places didn’t extend their times, but did remain open to allow anyone who had been in line before the polls closed to vote.

Despite little evidence of a rigged system or widespread voter fraud, Trump has continuously called for his supporters to act as unofficial “poll watchers” on Election Day.

“We don’t want to lose an election because you know what I’m talking about,” he told a predominately white crowd in Manheim, Pa., last month. “Because you know what? That’s a big, big problem, and nobody wants to talk about it. Nobody has the guts to talk about it. So go and watch these polling places.”

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Arizona election law that could help GOP will stay on the books
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today