Why did this Long Island elementary school cancel its mock election?

Negative student behavior – mirroring adult behavior across the US – alarmed faculty and staff to the point that the school's election was called off.

Halie Miller/AP
Students in Halie Miller’s fourth grade class at Glacier Ridge Elementary School in Dublin, Ohio, use an Electoral College map to create different combinations of numbers to get to the magic number of 270 electoral votes needed for victory as part of a math assignment.

Political rhetoric in the run-up to Election Day grew so heated and divisive at a New York elementary school that administrators decided to call off the traditional mock election and replace it with a poll about something slightly less controversial: school lunches.

After being exposed to racially charged and lewd comments related to the presidential campaign via news media, friends, and family, students at Jericho Elementary School in Centereach on Long Island were heard reciting offensive talking points and clashing about very adult subject matter during the school day, Principal Glen Rogers said.

"Children in the cafeteria would bring up things about minorities and the voting and the candidates," Mr. Rogers told ABC 7 in New York. "And there were some negative things said."

The cancellation highlights the manner in which polarizing politics can trickle down, through families, media, and other cultural institutions, into the social realities of children. What's more, some schools have further affected their students' day-to-day lives by canceling classes on Nov. 8, as a cautionary hedge against the possibility of unrest. These realities reflect, perhaps, a broader fatigue that has some calling for Americans to hit a reset button and make the Thanksgiving holiday one of healing and civility.

In the meantime, educators are trying their best to salvage a civics lesson out of the current political milieu. Kate McDonald, a Jericho teacher, said her students would select their own class president by focusing on qualifications, not controversies.

"So they're taking some of the highlights that they learned from the candidates out there now, the positive ones, and trying to implement them into the classroom," Ms. McDonald told ABC 7.

And despite the cancellation in New York, more than 100,000 students between the ages of 13 and 19 in all 50 states took part in a separate mock election last month. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump won that contest over Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, but more than 20 percent of the students cast their non-binding ballots for third-party candidates.

Jeffrey Collins, a vice president of the After School program that conducted the mock election, told CNN that the surprisingly high support for Libertarian Gary Johnson and the Green Party's Dr. Jill Stein could be attributed to the fact that teens "prefer outsiders" and tend to see Mrs. Clinton as part of the status quo.

High school and college students from 19 states who competed in a contest sponsored by the American Statistical Association, however, predicted that Clinton would win the presidency. Based on analyses of real-world polling, 97 percent of participants predicted a Democratic victory.

Molly Joll, an eighth-grade social studies teachers in Valparaiso, Ind., told the Post-Tribune that her students had successfully taken an issues-focused approach to their mock election. The lesson has been indispensable, especially in a state where voter participation is particularly low during non-presidential election years.

"It takes some of the fear away from the process," Ms. Joll said, adding that educators should encourage students to practice using their own political voice.

"They need to engage them because they might not think their vote matters, but it does," she said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why did this Long Island elementary school cancel its mock election?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today