More women are turning out for early voting. Is this a Trump effect?

Data from early voting in North Carolina, Florida, and Georgia show that more women are showing up for early voting, especially women registered as Democrats.

Andrew Harnik/AP
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton greets members of the audience at a Women for Hillary fundraiser at the Hyatt Regency in Washington, Wednesday, Oct. 5, 2016.

The 2012 election year saw one of the biggest gender gaps in history, with women voting for President Barack Obama in huge numbers.

Four years later, the role of women in determining the elections may once again be noteworthy. Data from early voting in North Carolina, Florida, and Georgia are showing that women, especially Democratic women, are voting early in disproportionate numbers, as Politico reports.

“That’s certainly an energy and mobilization indicator this early for the Clinton campaign and Democrats down ballot,” J. Michael Bitzer, expert on early voting in North Carolina at Catawba College told Politico.

While a gender gap in voting is normal, some polls have indicated that the 2016 elections may see the largest gap ever, although it is too early to tell if it will eclipse Obama’s record. The motivation may be traced to what is at stake this election: a potential first female president in the history of the United States and alienation from presidential candidate Donald Trump who has made public remarks viewed as misogynistic, with 10 women accusing him of sexual misconduct.

According to early poll data in North Carolina analyzed by Mr. Bitzer, 87,000 Democratic women voters cast early ballots compared to 60,000 Republican women, while 50,000 Republican men and 52,000 Democrat men have done the same.

In Florida, early-voting expert Daniel Smith from the University of Florida found that 55 percent of the 880,000 people who had cast early ballots by the end of Wednesday were women, although they represent less than 53 percent of registered voters in the state. A poll on Friday from Georgia indicates Clinton in the lead by 5 percentage points among early voters due to a bump in support from early-voting women.

The phenomenon of women voting early, the experts noted, occurred especially after the first debate when among other things, Trump attacked Miss Universe Alicia Machado for gaining weight. Absentee ballot requests surged among women in Georgia and North Carolina in that week.

“In the big scheme of things, these are small numbers relative to the total ballots that will be cast in these states,” Michael McDonald, an early vote expert who runs the United States Elections Project, wrote in a blog for Huffington Post regarding the surge. “Still, I suspect that at least some of the movement towards Clinton in the polling is due to increased interest in the election among women, thus making them more often fit the profile of a likely voter.”

FiveThirtyEight founder Nate Silver had written earlier this month that “if Trump loses the election, it will be because women voted against him.” By looking at data from multiple polls in October, he found that Clinton led Trump by 15 percentage points among women while she is behind Trump by 5 percentage points among men. Another writer for the site, Harry Enten, looked at historical data and contended that Clinton’s lead among women is the biggest since 1972.

But it's still too early to say whether the surge in early voting among women is significant. The Democratic party overall tends to gain more from early voting, and the gap between the two candidates is still narrow. A Reuters/Ipsos poll released Friday showed that up to 63 percent of voters polled believe that Trump has committed sexual assault in the past, but they still support him, indicating loyalty for party over candidate.

There has been, however, some party-line crossing by Republican women to support Hillary Clinton, as previously reported by The Christian Science Monitor. Michele Swers, professor at Georgetown University, tells The Monitor that “party affiliations in general trump gender,” but also: “It’s rare that you can say these things and not have more problems.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to More women are turning out for early voting. Is this a Trump effect?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today