Tiger bites woman in Omaha, Internet erupts with concern ... for tiger

Police say woman who seemed intoxicated broke into an Omaha zoo to pet a tiger believed to be Mai, a Malayan tiger with an amputated limb.

A woman was hospitalized on Sunday for severe injuries to her left hand after she snuck into Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium in Omaha, Neb., before it opened and reached her hand into a cage to pet a tiger.

Jacqueline Eide was taken to Creighton University Medical Center by a friend, reports local TV station, KETV.

In a police report filed from the hospital, officials said, “Eide was aggressive toward staff and showed signs of intoxication of alcohol and/or drugs.” Though the incident is under investigation, said police, Ms. Eide was cited Sunday for criminal trespass.

According to media reports, zoo officials believe that the tiger that bit Eide is 18-year-old Mai, a Malayan tiger who came to the Omaha zoo in 2003 after her rehabilitation from a limb amputation that saved her life. As a cub, Mai was found in Malaysia with her front left leg entangled in a poacher’s trap, according to the zoo’s website.

Zoo officials said online that Mai is graceful and personable.

She’s very friendly, which is odd because she came from the wild,” Mike Verbrigghe, lead keeper of cats at the zoo said in June blog post on the Omaha Zoo Foundation website.

KETV report that Eide has a criminal history, including convictions of drunk driving, graffiti, disturbing the peace, obstruction of justice, and shoplifting. She was arrested twice in Omaha this year and was sentenced to prison time for her third DUI in 2011.

In response to the news Sunday, the public took to Facebook to express concern for the tiger.

Erin Pauley wrote on the Zoo’s Facebook page, “I hope nothing happens to poor Mai or the zoo based on the irresponsible decisions of two drunken individuals. In my opinion, it serves the girl right that she was bitten. A tiger is still a wild animal, after all!”

Zoo officials have assured the public that Mai will not be punished for the bite, writing on Facebook, “Mai will remain on display as normal and go about life as usual. No action will be taken against her.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.