Are e-cigarettes a gateway to traditional smoking for teens?

New research fuels concerns that electronic cigarettes may be a stepping stone to smoking combustible cigarettes, cigars, and hookahs.

Markell DeLoatch/Center for Public Opinion/AP
Electronic cigarettes, seen at Vape House, Chambersburg, are growing in popularity and are considered a healthy choice than smoking tobacco. A new study links e-cigarettes with later tobacco use.

Teenagers who have used electronic cigarettes by the time they start ninth grade are more likely than others to start smoking tobacco-based products such as cigarettes, cigars, and hookahs in the future, according to a new study.

Researchers from the University of Southern California compared tobacco use initiation among 222 students who had used e-cigarettes and 2,308 who had neither used e-cigarettes nor combustible tobacco products when initially surveyed at the start of ninth grade.

According to the study, which was published on Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association, 30.7 percent of teen e-cigarette smokers switched to more traditional tobacco products within six months, compared with just 8.1 percent of those who had never used e-cigarettes.

“Recreational e-cigarette use is becoming increasingly popular among teens who have never smoked tobacco. Adolescents who enjoy the experience of inhaling nicotine via e-cigarettes could be more apt to experiment with other nicotine products, including smokeable tobacco,” study author Adam M. Leventhal, who is an associate professor of preventative medicine at the University of Southern California, said in a press release. “While we cannot conclude that e-cigarette use directly leads to smoking, this research raises concerns that recent increases in youth e-cigarette use could ultimately perpetuate the epidemic of smoking-related illness."

Professor Levanthal and his colleagues write:

"These data provide new evidence that e-cigarette use is prospectively associated with increased risk of combustible tobacco use initiation during early adolescence. Associations were consistent across unadjusted and adjusted models, multiple tobacco product outcomes, and various sensitivity analyses.

"Some teens may be more likely to use e-cigarettes prior to combustible tobacco because of beliefs that e-cigarettes are not harmful or addictive, youth-targeted marketing, availability of e-cigarettes in flavors attractive to youths, and ease of accessing e-cigarettes due to either an absence or inconsistent enforcement of restrictions against sales to minors."

National data show that e-cigarettes have become more popular among teens than traditional cigarettes, as The Christian Science Monitor previously reported. Electronic cigarettes are battery-powered devices that heat liquid nicotine into inhalable vapor a process often called “vaping.”

In 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration proposed rules that would ban the sale of electronic cigarettes to minors and would add the devices to the list of tobacco products it regulates.

E-cigarette manufacturers and some public health experts say that e-cigarettes can be a safer alternative for people who are trying to quick smoking cigarettes. Others have expressed concerns that the new devices could serve as an attractive gateway for teens that could undermine decades of public health campaigns designed at discouraging tobacco use.

In 2014, a study by Yale University found that, antismoking campaigns have saved 8 million lives since smoking was declared harmful in 1964.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.