Earthquake map: 42 states stand 'reasonable chance' of temblors

US Geological Survey updates its earthquake risk map, which heightens the risk for one-third of the US and lowers it for about one-tenth. The surprise is how pervasive relative risk is throughout the United States.

Jessica Robertson / US Geological Survey
Students take part in the Great Southeast ShakeOut earthquake drill at Langston Hughes Middle School in Reston, Va., in October 2012. They are conducting the 'drop, cover, and hold on' safety procedure.

Earthquakes can happen anywhere. While most Americans associate quake hazards with the West Coast, one-third of the states in the nation face a “relatively high likelihood of experiencing damaging ground shaking,” according to a new report from the US Geological Survey.

The latest national seismic hazard map from the USGS, released Thursday, lends a more nuanced view to earthquake risks across the country than ever before, thanks to new advances in sensing instruments, modeling technology, and data analysis tools, says Mark Petersen, chief of the USGS National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project.

The new map includes heightened hazard levels for eastern states, the West Coast, and the central US. This reflects a better understanding of risks, not an actual increase of threat, Mr. Petersen stresses. In a few isolated places, namely New York City and Irvine, Oakland, and Santa Barbara, Calif., newly available data have led to reduced threat levels. The new data do not include risk assessment for earthquakes that some experts say may be caused by deep-well injection or hydraulic fracturing.

The report singles out 16 states that are considered high-risk: Alaska, Arkansas, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. That designation may not come as a surprise to residents of many of those states, with the exception of South Carolina, where a major quake has not occurred since 1886.

However, what’s more surprising is how pervasive relative risk is throughout the country. The USGS reports that 42 of the 50 states have a “reasonable chance” of experiencing ground-shaking in the next 50 years. Mr. Petersen suggests that these states should take that risk seriously.

“It's important that people consider the hazard that they face,” Petersen says. “This might be low on the list of priorities for some places, but it’s important when the consequences of inaction are very high.”

While residents of high-risk areas along the West Coast, Utah, and near the New Madrid fault in Minnesota tend to be aware of the hazards associated with tremors, in other parts of the country, particularly along the East Coast, earthquakes aren’t necessarily on people’s radar – even in places that have experienced devastating historic quakes.

In 1775, a tremor that was likely a Magnitude 6 earthquake (the Richter scale used to measure a quake’s intensity was not introduced until 1935) rocked Cape Ann, Mass., and caused extensive damage in Boston. The shock of that quake reverberated as far north as Nova Scotia and as far south as the Chesapeake Bay.

A century later, an even larger quake hit South Carolina, killing 83 people within the municipal boundaries of Charleston, and likely as many more residents living in the countryside, says social historian Richard Côté.

Despite numerous firsthand accounts in historic newspapers detailing the havoc and devastation caused by the Magnitude 7.3 quake, many residents in South Carolina are unaware of the risks posed by local seismic activity, says Mr. Côté, who took on the self-appointed role of “earthquake preparedness evangelist” after conducting several years of research into the 1886 Great Charleston Earthquake.

“People tend forget about these quakes,” Petersen says.

On Aug. 23, 2011, a Magnitude 5.8 earthquake in rural Virginia caught much of the East Coast off guard. That quake was felt by tens of millions of people up and down the Eastern seaboard, Petersen says. The last time a significant quake occurred in the Central Virginia Seismic Zone was 1875, illustrating the fact that just because a quake has not occurred in a very long time does not mean that another one will not occur in the future.

“I don’t want to be an alarmist in all of this and make people feel like they need to panic or anything,” Peteresen says. He subsequently added that he hopes that urban planners and builders will use the new USGS map and urban hazard maps that he expects to emerge during the next several years to fortify historic buildings.

“If you don’t prepare your buildings, then you might pay a high cost later if the earthquake does occur,” Petersen says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.