Iconic ‘The Scream’ to be sold at auction. How Munch will it fetch?

A Norwegian businessman, whose father knew Edvard Munch, is selling the last privately held version of ‘The Scream.’ Some speculate the much-reproduced work could bring $80 million.

Sotheby's/AP/File
This photo provided by Sotheby's shows 'The Scream' by Norwegian painter Edvard Munch.

News that Norwegian painter Edvard Munch’s most famous work, “The Scream,” goes on sale Wednesday night has sent a ripple through both the art world and popular culture.

That’s because while few have ever actually seen an original (Munch created four versions), the image of a pale face gripped by both hands, emitting a soundless howl, may just possibly be one of the most well-known “high art” icons of the past century.

Reproduced everywhere from dorm posters to key fobs and tee-shirts, and referenced in films such as “Scream “ and “Home Alone,” it has come to symbolize wordless horror, personal anxiety, and existential pain.

The version on sale is the only one remaining in private hands and observers of the Sotheby’s auction have speculated it could go for as much as $80 million.

For the uninitiated – and there may still be some who have never seen even a picture of the original – this auction and the publicity surrounding the sale  may introduce them to what Los Angeles art critic Edward Goldman calls one of the masterpieces of modern painting. 

“That astonishing price tag will get people’s attention,” he says, adding, “this is not a bad thing. After that they may Google him. They may learn more about Munch and who knows, maybe move on to other painters.

“It doesn’t matter which door they take to enter the temple of good art,” he adds with a laugh, “as long as they come in.”

The rarefied world of collectors who can afford that sort of price tag, however, does distress him. “I am very saddened by the prospect that this work will simply surface briefly, then disappear into the private collection of some wealthy art collector, never to be seen again,” says Mr. Goldman.

A private sale would have little, if any, effect on the enduring power of the imagery, however, points out Robert Thompson, the Syracuse University popular culture expert, a reality that Munch himself might applaud, he adds. 

“I doubt Munch would be rolling over in his grave at the thought that his vision is often experienced in the cramped space between a dorm bunk bed and the microwave,” he says with a laugh, noting that the artist himself not only made several versions but also created lithographs to further extend its reach.

The fact that few people have ever experienced “The Scream” as an original artwork – the three state-owned iterations reside in Norwegian museums – says as much about the modern era of art appreciation as it does the power of the imagery Munch created, points out Professor Thomson.

“This is as much about the ideas that it evokes as it is about the texture or color or even composition,” he says. The idea is as important as the execution – and can be infinitely reproduced without necessarily diminishing the power of the work to evoke a meaningful response.

Even a poor reproduction of Munch’s creation has power, points out Goldman, who says that despite the work being created in the 1890s, “it seems to embody all the horror and prejudices of the 20th century,” including two World Wars and the power of mass self-annihilation.

He notes that up until this current version surfaced for Wednesday’s auction, “it was largely known only through a black and white photograph.”

That said, the extraordinary value placed on this iteration comes from the fact that it is the only one housed in a frame painted by the artist and it is also the only version with a poem attached, explaining its origins in Munch’s experience.

He describes himself on a path overlooking the city of Oslo, with the sun setting in a blaze of red streaks through the sky, "shivering with anxiety" and feeling "the great scream in nature." 

The work is being sold by a Norwegian businessman, Petter Olsen, whose father was a neighbor and patron to Munch.

Proceeds from the sale will fund a new art and culture center as well as a hotel in Hvitsten, Norway, where Olsen's father and the artist were neighbors.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.