WikiLeaks publishes Stratfor e-mails. What's in them?

An initial survey of the Stratfor e-mails published so far on the WikiLeaks website reveals not so much a corporate CIA as a geopolitical version of the comedy 'The Office.'

Cassandra Vinograd/AP/File
The home page of the Stratfor website is seen on a computer monitor in London in this Jan. 11 file photo. The whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks has published confidential emails from Stratfor.

WikiLeaks says Stratfor is a corporate CIA – a shadowy firm that vacuums up intelligence from the top levels of governments around the globe. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says that’s why his anti-secrecy group on Monday began releasing a trove of confidential Stratfor e-mails.

Stratfor has paid off informants, monitored activist groups on behalf of multinationals, and invested cash based on its intelligence findings, charged Mr. Assange during an appearance at London’s Frontline Club.

“What we have discovered is a company that is a private intelligence Enron,” said Assange, referring to the Texas energy giant that became a byword for corporate wrongdoing.

WikiLeaks is working with a network of international media organizations to organize and publish the e-mails, whose provenance remains unclear. It’s possible that explosive findings are yet to come. But an initial survey of the e-mails published so far on WikiLeaks's own website reveals not so much a corporate Central Intelligence Agency as a geopolitical version of the comedy “The Office,” complete with lunch theft, ribald interoffice accusations, jokes about interns, and unsubstantiated blather about world politics.

The e-mails also contain names, contact numbers, and internal passwords of dozens of clients and contacts – just the sort of non-vetted personal information that WikiLeaks has been criticized for publishing in the past.

The tortellini caper

One e-mail chain released by WikiLeaks involves the theft of a bowl of pesto tortellini from a refrigerator in Statfor’s Austin, Texas, office. The perpetrator owns up to what he terms a mistake in food identification, but not before dispensing an intel-world homily: “Admit nothing, deny everything, and make counter-accusations.”

Spying for Coca-Cola

The e-mails do reveal some clear examples of intelligence gathering on behalf of corporate clients. Among these was Coca-Cola, which prior to the 2010 Vancouver Olympics was apparently worried about the animal rights group PETA, for some reason.

A Coke manager sent Stratfor a list of questions it wanted answered at a private briefing, including how active PETA was in Canada, what its methods were, and whether PETA had links to other activist groups. The threat to a soda firm from PETA remained unclear.

Criminality of British soccer teams

Other e-mails released include long lists of guidance – topics that Stratfor wished its analysts to cover. Organized by region, they were generally hortatory yet bland. A section on Eurasian economics, for instance, reminded that “bankruptcies and bank bailouts are important.”

Yet within these e-mails are occasional statements that perhaps bear further investigation. In a section on Britain written in 2009, for example, Stratfor urges close attention to who is buying the nation’s soccer teams.

“May seem silly, but European soccer leagues are avenues for money laundering. Good to know who is laundering what money,” states the e-mail.

Another section in that same 2009 e-mail notes that the Balkans is rife with organized crime, or “OC.” About the small Balkans nation of Montenegro, the e-mail makes the startling charge that “the entire country is OC, including the government.”

Stratfor equals Kremlin

Time wasting in the corporate world can take many forms, from unnecessary meetings to office basketball pools. At one point, the Stratfor staff engaged in a hearty round of “Stratfor’s Kremlin Model,” in which they discussed who among them was equivalent to which official in Vladimir Putin’s Kremlin.

While undoubtedly learned, this discussion may have contributed just as much to the firm’s bottom line as would an interoffice Angry Birds tournament.

Stratfor itself has said the messages appear to be those stolen by hackers over the Christmas holidays. Beyond that, it will have little to say about the message content.

“Having had our property stolen, we will not be victimized twice by submitting to questioning about them,” said the company Monday in a statement.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.