New Orleans' razing craze aims to clear way for post-Katrina recovery

New Orleans is on a mission to raze thousands of properties abandoned after hurricane Katrina. Many are in neighborhoods, such as the Lower Ninth Ward, where poor and minority residents were concentrated.

Ann Hermes/Staff
Workers cleared the remains of a former apartment complex in the Lower Ninth Ward in New Orleans on Nov. 14. Many homes remain abandoned.
Rich Clabaugh/Staff

What hurricane Katrina started nearly seven years ago, the city of New Orleans itself is now in the unenviable position of finishing.

Mayor Mitch Landrieu has made razing and cleaning up 40,000 abandoned homes and properties – the biggest such inventory in the nation, besting Detroit – a cornerstone of his administration. His aim: to piece back together the racial and social mosaic that for centuries defined the gritty, buoyant city along the Mississippi River's crescent bend.

The 2010 Census, conducted five years after Katrina, found that 25 percent of New Orleans residential addresses were vacant, and Mr. Landrieu's administration is now moving aggressively to tear down homes that are abandoned or deemed uninhabitable. Last year the city razed 1,589 decrepit buildings, up from 154 two years earlier, in an attempt to clear the way for redevelopment in neighborhoods previously filled (and still partially filled) with poor and minority residents.

So far, Landrieu, who took office in May 2010, is getting an 'A' for effort. Aside from demolitions, the city subsidized construction of 1,038 new homes and 168 renovations in 2011. New Orleans, on the whole, saw home prices rise 11 percent last year.

But the mayor's goal of redeveloping 10,000 blighted properties by the end of 2013 won't be easy to achieve. Financial and political hurdles are substantial, never mind Louisiana's unique adherence to the property rules of the Napoleonic Code, where the concept of "forced heirship," or guaranteed property rights of descendants, can create a Gordian knot of paperwork for lawyers to untangle.

After clearing so many lots, what does the city hope to do with them? In short, officials intend to sell the cleared lots to developers through auctions, or use federal grants to give private and nonprofit developers incentive to build homes and apartments for low- and moderate-income residents.

"They're trying to find whatever means possible, including incentives, to maximize [available land] to create viable communities," says Rob Olshansky, a University of Illinois planning professor who has studied post-Katrina re-building. "But there are still two questions that remain: What happens to all those people who thought they wanted to rebuild but didn't because their neighbors weren't coming back? And, two, if the city ends up obtaining the most undesirable properties in the city, are they going to end up just holding a bunch of stuff that's going to cost money to maintain?"

Five years ago, residents helped create a blueprint for rebuilding New Orleans known as the Unified Plan. It backed resettlement of hard-hit areas in poor, low-lying districts, partly in a bid to retain a diverse populace. But New Orleans is today in danger of becoming what residents expressly said they didn't want: a smaller, whiter, more upscale city. Beyond the edges of the French Quarter and the tony Garden District, weedy wastelands dominate fabled neighborhoods such as the Lower Ninth Ward, Pontilly, and Lakeview, and in some spots packs of pitbulls roam, squatters languish, and the odd boat lies overturned.

"Families should come home, but you can't come home to something that's not there," says Perrie Duplessis, an aspiring carpenter working on a home in the Upper Ninth Ward.

While most agree that the sheer scope of blight is retarding the city's recovery, not everyone sees the bulldozer as the answer.

"The fact that New Orleans still has so many intact historic neighborhoods is a testament to the fact that we haven't had much good government, that we're not terribly efficient at tearing things down, and that there are huge proponents of preservation who say, 'Whoa, let's not just go crazy and tear everything down,' " says architecture historian Jane Brooks, chairwoman of urban planning at the University of New Orleans. "But you do have this particular problem since Katrina, where people are trying to rebuild next door to an abandoned property with weeds waist-high and rats, and it's not conducive for those putting sweat and money" into redevelopment.

But weeds and decrepit homes are not the main challenge for city planners, some experts argue. Rather, it's that the old social order has exploded, leaving a Katrina diaspora that is reluctant to return to darkened streets where commerce, social scenes, and property values have yet to revive.

"In the Ninth Ward especially, we're talking about a total collapse of a market, where all different aspects – socioeconomic, demographic, infrastructure, business – every system, including the social system, collapsed" as a result of Katrina, says Michelle Thompson, a demographer at the University of New Orleans. "It's a system that needed to be rebuilt, and all of it was not done in a comprehensive way. The unified planning process ... was great, but the implementation has not happened."

In the Lower Ninth Ward, empty lots now outnumber those with houses on them, according to a University of New Orleans website that tracks property data, and Professor Olshansky expects that some of that vacant land eventually will be reconfigured into parks.

To pursue his blight fight, Landrieu has stepped up code enforcement and increased tax lien foreclosures. Moreover, last month one of his top insiders, "blight czar" Jeff Hebert, a planner trained at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was appointed to lead the state-chartered New Orleans Redevelopment Authority – a sign that two entities that have butted heads in the past will be working more collaboratively. In another dramatic move, the city is taking possession of 3,600 properties handed over to the state as part of the Road Home recovery program.

As street resurfacing projects pick up, new schools and playgrounds open, and visible progress is made to eradicate blight, a sense of momentum is building in the Big Easy, city officials insist.

"Everybody has been waiting for this kind of work in New Orleans, and I think you're going to see great success," says Mr. Hebert.

Staff photographer Ann Hermes contributed reporting for this story.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.